From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35859C3F2D7 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 22:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8D521739 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 22:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="aaGbZGjt" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726907AbgCBWUK (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 17:20:10 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-f65.google.com ([209.85.216.65]:39138 "EHLO mail-pj1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726728AbgCBWUK (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 17:20:10 -0500 Received: by mail-pj1-f65.google.com with SMTP id o5so395619pjs.4 for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 14:20:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eiRXpYLqa4ejnGphOY97gu7ECpDZYBemFYjwQAOSIN8=; b=aaGbZGjtJ97tAFGUqz1YUpCvWUuKvLCOUoq7GqERz+rB0v9aKkWW1Vu0eodTPN9RqX 872hdjf3v+n810DIGbWsb1YA3ylC25C8v7EbWQNdSnyn6CmqUl7EYIv2FFTiNddxIOh7 lGAwzdPNbyd6Btislx/JrjefO+I8oHSBuVzcuGPCQJBgfUM96yWecj+MmA8ndhCrt1qV wsqBoVrTHQprLkdeFc8bBH4cBTEiANYeLNTg2xN2rJdvvRvKUTfzQ4otrxw9aIwvUrKk aglUxIPKqfFRNTr5MBy60063UjLYzQNw6+c5p0GejmWLVief8dOlfKcEFSvRknw4chxX 3HJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eiRXpYLqa4ejnGphOY97gu7ECpDZYBemFYjwQAOSIN8=; b=jQz6dh+PORaTJevJ2JBXgShiJZzQTdXz+88LaKOeV69q9AyFvbc/1wxQYDT2d3D/k+ FFpOpA4fKshfUdXHfoEntrC+dsSz19NLT7x9LVIuQAB0BGGw5AsmfpoPuE+zkQHJOhNk hVO6VXPsFeSsqhwf5F9nqmSUsploS5oBN+97wszCs3mSytB39+F6ilK4LVQoVanNGnab wRT8NfRKYjh5gXgyCEPohJ47Pfodtg2u+rykk8K90b8wHbySZgCOHbuSSso7nmECGKaQ YWy1gA6OxdV/ix7eV0SUvs9nNCvbDMkbQW2tLhhPByQkY+VNdhtQnCc6RX12qWdxGV/u Zwzw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0ACBhwE6wv/bn3FuQLRwqT5qlDWonXUkwuIJBUUvrwHOkEp8ga z+QDboV7vQ2EsIinGqih3P79HHj1WCh7B23sCM6nrQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuOaeld9UBVLAooUJ2zjVQ14iAl+j/4kAj7yT6yN5YktIvgDo9o5Nd/iazOvMtSLESD5sgw76KV2VeNpaXLVLU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:3a90:: with SMTP id b16mr120232pjc.29.1583187608902; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 14:20:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200228012036.15682-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> <20200302200337.GH11244@42.do-not-panic.com> <20200302211640.GA8364@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: <20200302211640.GA8364@roeck-us.net> From: Brendan Higgins Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:19:57 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] kunit: create a centralized executor to dispatch all KUnit tests To: Guenter Roeck , Luis Chamberlain Cc: Jeff Dike , Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , Arnd Bergmann , Kees Cook , Shuah Khan , Alan Maguire , Iurii Zaikin , David Gow , Andrew Morton , rppt@linux.ibm.com, Frank Rowand , Greg KH , Stephen Boyd , Logan Gunthorpe , linux-um , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , KUnit Development , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 1:16 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 08:03:37PM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > Guenter, > > > > are you still running your cross-architecture tests? If so any chance > > Yes > > > you can try this for your build tests? > > > > I didn't have KUNIT_TEST enabled to start with. I did that now, and > started a test run on mainline a minute ago. We'll see how that goes. FYI, kbuild already found some architectures for which this change doesn't work. So far, I need to fix: - arm64 (32 bit seems to work fine) - i386 in some cases. > Afterwards, sure, I can run the series in a test branch. It would be great > if I can pick it up from a repository somewhere. Cool, I will post my next revision to a branch somewhere. Thanks!