linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
To: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Cc: davidgow@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] kunit: make kunit_kfree() not segfault on invalid inputs
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 16:39:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFd5g47-EqGY4ZwaH_btjhweFSqjLZ=3cq8M26pvf8yuwL3Qhg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220722171534.3576419-4-dlatypov@google.com>

On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 1:15 PM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> wrote:
>
> kunit_kfree() can only work on data ("resources") allocated by KUnit.
>
> Currently for code like this,
> > void *ptr = kmalloc(4, GFP_KERNEL);
> > kunit_kfree(test, ptr);
> kunit_kfree() will segfault.
>
> It'll try and look up the kunit_resource associated with `ptr` and get a
> NULL back, but it won't check for this. This means we also segfault if
> you double-free.
>
> Change kunit_kfree() so it'll notice these invalid pointers and respond
> by failing the test.
>
> Implementation: kunit_destroy_resource() does what kunit_kfree() does,
> but is more generic and returns -ENOENT when it can't find the resource.
> Sadly, unlike just letting it crash, this means we don't get a stack
> trace. But kunit_kfree() is so infrequently used it shouldn't be hard to
> track down the bad callsite anyways.
>
> After this change, the above code gives:
> > # example_simple_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/kunit/test.c:702
> > kunit_kfree: 00000000626ec200 already freed or not allocated by kunit
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-05 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-22 17:15 [PATCH v2 1/5] kunit: string-stream: Simplify resource use Daniel Latypov
2022-07-22 17:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] kunit: drop test pointer in string_stream_fragment Daniel Latypov
2022-10-05 20:30   ` Brendan Higgins
2022-07-22 17:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] kunit: make kunit_kfree() only work on pointers from kunit_malloc() and friends Daniel Latypov
2022-10-05 20:36   ` Brendan Higgins
2022-07-22 17:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] kunit: make kunit_kfree() not segfault on invalid inputs Daniel Latypov
2022-10-05 20:39   ` Brendan Higgins [this message]
2022-07-22 17:15 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] kunit: make kunit_kfree(NULL) a no-op to match kfree() Daniel Latypov
2022-07-23  6:33   ` David Gow
2022-10-05 20:40   ` Brendan Higgins
2022-10-05 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] kunit: string-stream: Simplify resource use Brendan Higgins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFd5g47-EqGY4ZwaH_btjhweFSqjLZ=3cq8M26pvf8yuwL3Qhg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=dlatypov@google.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).