From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF527ECDE32 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 22:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA0A213A2 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 22:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="Wb669e7H" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7AA0A213A2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727744AbeJRGnf (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Oct 2018 02:43:35 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f67.google.com ([209.85.210.67]:36518 "EHLO mail-ot1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727714AbeJRGnf (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Oct 2018 02:43:35 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f67.google.com with SMTP id x4so26488552otg.3 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:45:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=41kLMsj9/C9m/jLV7WTpIkSmXO/8CR/R+tjmnpT1yCY=; b=Wb669e7Hzz7kmStYRwjKlDSBG+5F+UlLQONn3K1A1B/tWjKJAOVNLyoSQmBoGgQC3Z qAakV6zZDqGpww2g58qv891PTfdBZyS6MQMIny/mZ/sL0Yy9D7bwgexrQJIJjA+n0WVR +qDUzU2iUME6PnVnc0jARRpOWyHy11Z5AyhrDk5MUKB/r78dFgVc5Zgs0dyYm1ad2mmm nxItYIPo1QJPCXydFoQq5uQWjWo4INY1TVAXCyHrmXuJJfU6FCZK/Sw+Wm0be8Bl2h00 1bz5UQrcw1KJ49T02LuEjYFL+zc+ZSdyBXz5HySQ3EOA192V7a0qZnOp9olrAhDL1nNN vHew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=41kLMsj9/C9m/jLV7WTpIkSmXO/8CR/R+tjmnpT1yCY=; b=NWBEynHScDvB+l1H341yKnBuu3XPmBz1JlvHjr6ozc/fAYplThORs9J3h+HmmEZWRe TzGsPRyMvrRHl88g9oPZcv2Kf1Pp9aRWHo0q9kMZcw51W0OfYW2kJ+RayS/8GjL+cDod esx1o+Bu0DU0pYKTS5NJ8oiZ6z0he9K+f38UFO+6BQ4fo6YpORjm9WZltStjxeq8vUQ2 Pa2vrtT3/8Zk4qhTMSVQLCRvEhg/61UbqXoyUHNxwyNJ+fKdFDvBfL6XcUIAdEihQy29 qhYyC43R4Gw2e5v0sCxyLEgn6WUeMX6pKwFp96i8J7JJ66L2C0+G9PkQpP9htSFDG5kS +mxg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfojH8i0dOaIiGd9nHgQMZFO1nBrPsRW7m1j2Pv3+hU4D3L9vss1x 7BIK2r1XbK7YKE4rLqhC6IML2pQTDcomDDgvC8K9lA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61A/0TdK1LLCvFkfE50x4hI/B7JrA0E2yBkqq8QW7G/sf/Q05VrSfqdR5xuwMs24vpsXgQtJ22WKZfEamoGwRA= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2372:: with SMTP id k47mr17106696otd.98.1539816343837; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:45:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181016235120.138227-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> <20181016235120.138227-7-brendanhiggins@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Brendan Higgins Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:45:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v1 06/31] arch: um: enabled running kunit from User Mode Linux To: Tim.Bird@sony.com Cc: kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, Greg KH , Kees Cook , mcgrof@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, Joel Stanley , mpe@ellerman.id.au, joe@perches.com, brakmo@fb.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, khilman@baylibre.com, Julia Lawall , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , jdike@addtoit.com, richard@nod.at, linux-um@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 2:18 PM wrote: > > There are some > > other features we would like to add which would help with that goal as > > well like test isolation. We actually have a presubmit server > > internally for running KUnit tests that can usually respond to patches > > with test results within a couple minutes. Would something like that > > be interesting? > I think the code and architecture of the software that handles presubmit, > mail-list scanning, notifications, etc. would be of interest. But KUnit features > themselves (macro definitions, mocking vs. faking, etc.) would not. > I only say that in the context of CC-ing the automated testing list on the patch set. > Of course the KUnit features are interesting by themselves for testers doing > unit testing. Fair enough. Well, we will share what we have in that regard, but that belongs on a separate thread. BTW, what mailing list is that? I am also guessing your code isn't in the kernel repo; where is it?