From: Jinrong Liang <ljr.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] KVM: selftests: Test the consistency of the PMU's CPUID and its features
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:11:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFg_LQVsXjcnpnDFnP1rrypXD4N0DD3kYq_vxXK8SRzGjEjA1A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZTHJvQm-nDNkvldM@google.com>
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> 于2023年10月20日周五 08:28写道:
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023, Jinrong Liang wrote:
> > Jinrong Liang (9):
> > KVM: selftests: Add vcpu_set_cpuid_property() to set properties
> > KVM: selftests: Extend this_pmu_has() and kvm_pmu_has() to check arch
> > events
> > KVM: selftests: Add pmu.h for PMU events and common masks
> > KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on gp counters
> > KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on fixed counters
> > KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of gp counters
> > KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of fixed counters
> > KVM: selftests: Test Intel supported fixed counters bit mask
> > KVM: selftests: Test consistency of PMU MSRs with Intel PMU version
>
> I've pushed a modified version to
>
> https://github.com/sean-jc/linux/branches x86/pmu_counter_tests
>
> which also has fixes for KVM's funky handling of fixed counters. I'll wait for
> you to respond, but will tentatively plan on posting the above branch as v5
> some time next week.
I truly appreciate your time and effort in reviewing my patches and
making the necessary modifications. I've carefully examined the
updated code in the branch you kindly provided:
https://github.com/sean-jc/linux/branches x86/pmu_counter_tests
I completely agree with the changes you made. Please feel free to post
the modified branch as v5 next week. I will add AMD counters related
selftests after this patch set is merged.
Thank you once again for your time and guidance.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-20 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-11 11:43 [PATCH v4 0/9] KVM: selftests: Test the consistency of the PMU's CPUID and its features Jinrong Liang
2023-09-11 11:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] KVM: selftests: Add vcpu_set_cpuid_property() to set properties Jinrong Liang
2023-10-19 23:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-11 11:43 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] KVM: selftests: Extend this_pmu_has() and kvm_pmu_has() to check arch events Jinrong Liang
2023-10-19 23:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-11 11:43 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] KVM: selftests: Add pmu.h for PMU events and common masks Jinrong Liang
2023-10-19 23:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-11 11:43 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on gp counters Jinrong Liang
2023-10-19 23:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-11 11:43 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on fixed counters Jinrong Liang
2023-10-19 23:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-11 11:43 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of gp counters Jinrong Liang
2023-10-20 18:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-11 11:43 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of fixed counters Jinrong Liang
2023-09-11 11:43 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] KVM: selftests: Test Intel supported fixed counters bit mask Jinrong Liang
2023-10-20 0:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-20 19:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-21 9:58 ` Jinrong Liang
2023-09-11 11:43 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of PMU MSRs with Intel PMU version Jinrong Liang
2023-10-11 8:32 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] KVM: selftests: Test the consistency of the PMU's CPUID and its features Jinrong Liang
2023-10-20 0:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-20 9:11 ` Jinrong Liang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFg_LQVsXjcnpnDFnP1rrypXD4N0DD3kYq_vxXK8SRzGjEjA1A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ljr.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=aaronlewis@google.com \
--cc=cloudliang@tencent.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=likexu@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).