From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE71C43387 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:04:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA9920859 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:04:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ogDpR9hj" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732222AbfAPKEl (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2019 05:04:41 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f194.google.com ([209.85.222.194]:41755 "EHLO mail-qk1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731891AbfAPKEk (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2019 05:04:40 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f194.google.com with SMTP id 189so3390394qkj.8 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 02:04:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZdRJ//Al+7TrpSHqfgXJa9IQ9Wno7RlwX5/uoypigaE=; b=ogDpR9hjHUkL9ki0B3c+nx3Aum6eJbEz3z5kPph1GVnzZW49vE82rLVUKnco6n/BUt Oxy/ygWmzFfCn7vpQ+lU1WIENPBHVC1HZRBlgO1YemQ1AFelm0q8q5ObJjiTr7s5pDp+ THUniQ7848PSuN/lTB9pQrNFO6iaHSvQmur91Otp3MRcwcA9kRn/kJXrDptcnHhD0kS4 HlANwezIjrrFaPSpDHNeH58eT82lLbz9F6qxTQzzleYngCGt/RUxDO9ld/N+RbruJ4oE CoKCvvofnMNQhv6ccIW3O0hl9+JVfXTMS/gSU/ddOedW/bHdPL8pf0r+ygmAllWICg6O bFxg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZdRJ//Al+7TrpSHqfgXJa9IQ9Wno7RlwX5/uoypigaE=; b=ly3NoJnbeQlB2u3lEgbaAifdNtrFxOscxVEr/76E2YL0/+egC/M2RQAwthmaxSCo/v q3NcLU40vPTZscqr8QT09DS+FPetRRRc5X9MnNaFt5MlIlJrMj66D4oykiG/UbBRhZzz 3oaP5WISdaSWUu1jc9xUmNwwlblnZ+diGYihZWQ6SI0Fbh3j28OGUa+7jT6Ng2CQiWOc FY2PMKxH4+iw4QF2V/F7uS2gNwkfFZ0v1oy3fdD4bH7Ib2n6XDdUmOrCiSDwNYBdHtub ZD2+h88qIIPDp9xk42el/HnHyqd6C7Q9AAM23QwY1Y/iGG7wzhGEWOas8zJORCKHGyU4 V7sg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcDb/Vi5ECydiOpjp04s7PWJOZu85kRSfvn2+K3hjI2Za/ALL3d eNjfrRFM1AZ/ioH4MDcRG8nmuxlUzpIQqYGnnng= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6A9T3bU1dtHUmI5aKbuXFGUonsRZUuII6/cTSUgeBm227/Rsi4Mx59hzAgKoCnPwR3/2mG0ufGZ52MUh5T9ic= X-Received: by 2002:a37:6442:: with SMTP id y63mr6009160qkb.119.1547633079483; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 02:04:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190109171415.9954-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com> <5125335.cuvu72hbmo@phil> <8a0ea28a-961f-130b-bd76-9dbda42ea417@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <8a0ea28a-961f-130b-bd76-9dbda42ea417@ti.com> From: Enric Balletbo Serra Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:04:28 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] phy: phy-rockchip-inno-usb2: drop reading the utmi-avalid property To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Cc: Heiko Stuebner , Enric Balletbo i Serra , Guenter Roeck , linux-kernel , kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , kernel@collabora.com, Benson Leung , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Missatge de Kishon Vijay Abraham I del dia dc., 16 de gen. 2019 a les 9:46: > > Hi, > > On 10/01/19 5:56 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2019, 18:14:15 CET schrieb Enric Balletbo i Serra: > >> That property is no used in mainline and is not documented. The only > >> board using that property is the rk33-99-evb-rev1 and -rev2 in the > >> vendor kernel. The existence of a further -rev3 (which also looks way > >> better cared for compared rev1+2) indicates that the older ones are > >> probably some sort of preproduction models, where some wiring (on the soc > >> or board) may have gone wrong. > >> > >> It is also not clear why this is a hardware-description or a DT > >> property, so, as noboby seems to care of this just drop reading that > >> property. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra > > > > Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner > > For some reason, I don't seem to have the original patch in the inbox. Can you > resend it please? > Yes, seems that for some reason my script to add the maintainers failed, sorry about that. I'll resend the last three patches. > Thanks > Kishon > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-rockchip mailing list > Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip