From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751598AbeA3Jam (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 04:30:42 -0500 Received: from mail-qt0-f193.google.com ([209.85.216.193]:44372 "EHLO mail-qt0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751360AbeA3Jai (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 04:30:38 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225UajiOD4769PVdA6rQfo/xNuteTOn2ZjJRTZTipDYjIHZYhTuh9gmCDhG+FRe9/Fe4P7qMlbobtmcFjjRu/GQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171201120651.29633-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com> References: <20171201120651.29633-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com> From: Enric Balletbo Serra Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:30:36 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] pwm-backlight: enable/disable the PWM before/after LCD enable toggle. To: Enric Balletbo i Serra Cc: Lee Jones , Daniel Thompson , Jingoo Han , Rob Herring , Pavel Machek , Heiko Stuebner , Thierry Reding , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Richard Purdie , Jacek Anaszewski , Linux PWM List , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , Guenter Roeck , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, 2017-12-01 13:06 GMT+01:00 Enric Balletbo i Serra : > Before this patch the enable signal was set before the PWM signal and > vice-versa on power off. This sequence is wrong, at least, it is on > the different panels datasheets that I checked, so I inverted the sequence > to follow the specs. > > For reference the following panels have the mentioned sequence: > - N133HSE-EA1 (Innolux) > - N116BGE (Innolux) > - N156BGE-L21 (Innolux) > - B101EAN0 (Auo) > - B101AW03 (Auo) > - LTN101NT05 (Samsung) > - CLAA101WA01A (Chunghwa) > > Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra > Acked-by: Daniel Thompson > Acked-by: Jingoo Han > --- > Changes since v4: > - Rebase on top of mainline. > - Add the acks from Daniel Thompson and Jingoo Han. > Changes since v3: > - List the part numbers for the panel checked (Daniel Thompson) > Changes since v2: > - Add this as a separate patch (Thierry Reding) > Changes since v1: > - None > > drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 9 +++++---- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c > index 1c2289d..698ec68 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c > +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c > @@ -54,10 +54,11 @@ static void pwm_backlight_power_on(struct pwm_bl_data *pb, int brightness) > if (err < 0) > dev_err(pb->dev, "failed to enable power supply\n"); > > + pwm_enable(pb->pwm); > + > if (pb->enable_gpio) > gpiod_set_value_cansleep(pb->enable_gpio, 1); > > - pwm_enable(pb->pwm); > pb->enabled = true; > } > > @@ -66,12 +67,12 @@ static void pwm_backlight_power_off(struct pwm_bl_data *pb) > if (!pb->enabled) > return; > > - pwm_config(pb->pwm, 0, pb->period); > - pwm_disable(pb->pwm); > - > if (pb->enable_gpio) > gpiod_set_value_cansleep(pb->enable_gpio, 0); > > + pwm_config(pb->pwm, 0, pb->period); > + pwm_disable(pb->pwm); > + > regulator_disable(pb->power_supply); > pb->enabled = false; > } > -- > 2.9.3 > A gentle ping, It's been nearly two months since I sent this patchset, there is anything else that prevents these patches to land or incorporate in linux-next? Thanks, Enric