Re: [PATCH v9, 2/2] soc: mediatek: mmsys: Add mt8192 mmsys routing table

[Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com>]

Hi Yongqiang,

This patch already have my reviewed tag but I just noticed a small nit


Missatge de Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com> del dia dj., 30
de set. 2021 a les 16:00:
>
> mt8192 has different routing registers than mt8183
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8192-mmsys.h | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c    | 11 +++++
>  2 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8192-mmsys.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8192-mmsys.h b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8192-mmsys.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7ea1531ee8af
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8192-mmsys.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +
> +#ifndef __SOC_MEDIATEK_MT8192_MMSYS_H
> +#define __SOC_MEDIATEK_MT8192_MMSYS_H
> +
> +#define MT8192_MMSYS_OVL_MOUT_EN               0xf04
> +#define MT8192_DISP_OVL1_2L_MOUT_EN            0xf08
> +#define MT8192_DISP_OVL0_2L_MOUT_EN            0xf18
> +#define MT8192_DISP_OVL0_MOUT_EN               0xf1c
> +#define MT8192_DISP_RDMA0_SEL_IN               0xf2c
> +#define MT8192_DISP_RDMA0_SOUT_SEL             0xf30
> +#define MT8192_DISP_CCORR0_SOUT_SEL            0xf34
> +#define MT8192_DISP_AAL0_SEL_IN                        0xf38
> +#define MT8192_DISP_DITHER0_MOUT_EN            0xf3c
> +#define MT8192_DISP_DSI0_SEL_IN                        0xf40
> +#define MT8192_DISP_OVL2_2L_MOUT_EN            0xf4c
> +
> +#define MT8192_DISP_OVL0_GO_BLEND                      BIT(0)
> +#define MT8192_DITHER0_MOUT_IN_DSI0                    BIT(0)
> +#define MT8192_OVL0_MOUT_EN_DISP_RDMA0                 BIT(0)
> +#define MT8192_OVL2_2L_MOUT_EN_RDMA4                   BIT(0)
> +#define MT8192_DISP_OVL0_GO_BG                         BIT(1)
> +#define MT8192_DISP_OVL0_2L_GO_BLEND                   BIT(2)
> +#define MT8192_DISP_OVL0_2L_GO_BG                      BIT(3)
> +#define MT8192_OVL1_2L_MOUT_EN_RDMA1                   BIT(4)
> +#define MT8192_OVL0_MOUT_EN_OVL0_2L                    BIT(4)
> +#define MT8192_RDMA0_SEL_IN_OVL0_2L                    0x3
> +#define MT8192_RDMA0_SOUT_COLOR0                       0x1
> +#define MT8192_CCORR0_SOUT_AAL0                                0x1
> +#define MT8192_AAL0_SEL_IN_CCORR0                      0x1
> +#define MT8192_DSI0_SEL_IN_DITHER0                     0x1
> +
> +static const struct mtk_mmsys_routes mmsys_mt8192_routing_table[] = {
> +       {
> +               DDP_COMPONENT_OVL_2L0, DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA0,
> +               MT8192_DISP_OVL0_2L_MOUT_EN, MT8192_OVL0_MOUT_EN_DISP_RDMA0,
> +               MT8192_OVL0_MOUT_EN_DISP_RDMA0
> +       }, {
> +               DDP_COMPONENT_OVL_2L2, DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA4,
> +               MT8192_DISP_OVL2_2L_MOUT_EN, MT8192_OVL2_2L_MOUT_EN_RDMA4,
> +               MT8192_OVL2_2L_MOUT_EN_RDMA4
> +       }, {
> +               DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER, DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0,
> +               MT8192_DISP_DITHER0_MOUT_EN, MT8192_DITHER0_MOUT_IN_DSI0,
> +               MT8192_DITHER0_MOUT_IN_DSI0
> +       }, {
> +               DDP_COMPONENT_OVL_2L0, DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA0,
> +               MT8192_DISP_RDMA0_SEL_IN, MT8192_RDMA0_SEL_IN_OVL0_2L,
> +               MT8192_RDMA0_SEL_IN_OVL0_2L
> +       }, {
> +               DDP_COMPONENT_CCORR, DDP_COMPONENT_AAL0,
> +               MT8192_DISP_AAL0_SEL_IN, MT8192_AAL0_SEL_IN_CCORR0,
> +               MT8192_AAL0_SEL_IN_CCORR0
> +       }, {
> +               DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER, DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0,
> +               MT8192_DISP_DSI0_SEL_IN, MT8192_DSI0_SEL_IN_DITHER0,
> +               MT8192_DSI0_SEL_IN_DITHER0
> +       }, {
> +               DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA0, DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR0,
> +               MT8192_DISP_RDMA0_SOUT_SEL, MT8192_RDMA0_SOUT_COLOR0,
> +               MT8192_RDMA0_SOUT_COLOR0
> +       }, {
> +               DDP_COMPONENT_CCORR, DDP_COMPONENT_AAL0,
> +               MT8192_DISP_CCORR0_SOUT_SEL, MT8192_CCORR0_SOUT_AAL0,
> +               MT8192_CCORR0_SOUT_AAL0
> +       }, {
> +               DDP_COMPONENT_OVL0, DDP_COMPONENT_OVL_2L0,
> +               MT8192_MMSYS_OVL_MOUT_EN, MT8192_DISP_OVL0_GO_BG,
> +               MT8192_DISP_OVL0_GO_BG,
> +       }, {
> +               DDP_COMPONENT_OVL_2L0, DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA0,
> +               MT8192_MMSYS_OVL_MOUT_EN, MT8192_DISP_OVL0_2L_GO_BLEND,
> +               MT8192_DISP_OVL0_2L_GO_BLEND,
> +       }
> +};
> +
> +#endif /* __SOC_MEDIATEK_MT8192_MMSYS_H */
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
> index a78e88f27b62..6e97d1468183 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  #include "mt8167-mmsys.h"
>  #include "mt8183-mmsys.h"
>  #include "mt8365-mmsys.h"
> +#include "mt8192-mmsys.h"
>
>  static const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data mt2701_mmsys_driver_data = {
>         .clk_driver = "clk-mt2701-mm",
> @@ -59,6 +60,12 @@ static const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data mt8365_mmsys_driver_data = {
>         .num_routes = ARRAY_SIZE(mt8365_mmsys_routing_table),
>  };
>
> +static const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data mt8192_mmsys_driver_data = {
> +       .clk_driver = "clk-mt8192-mm",
> +       .routes = mmsys_mt8192_routing_table,
> +       .num_routes = ARRAY_SIZE(mmsys_mt8192_routing_table),
> +};
> +

For better readability it would be nice if you put this structure by
SoC order. That's before mt8365 struct and after mt8183 struct.

>  struct mtk_mmsys {
>         void __iomem *regs;
>         const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data *data;
> @@ -171,6 +178,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id of_match_mtk_mmsys[] = {
>                 .compatible = "mediatek,mt8365-mmsys",
>                 .data = &mt8365_mmsys_driver_data,
>         },
> +       {
> +               .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-mmsys",
> +               .data = &mt8192_mmsys_driver_data,
> +       },

The same here,  for better readability would be nice if you put this
fields by SoC order. That's before mt8365 fields and after mt8183
fields.

Thanks,
  Enric

>         { }
>  };
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>