Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] sh: fixes for various build and kconfig warnings

From: Daniel Palmer <daniel@0x0f.com>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	j-core@j-core.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] sh: fixes for various build and kconfig warnings
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 20:53:42 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFr9PXk_w_+4mec1OfQLzsYHta2P4rEFGwsJJv+LSQo+hzKGeg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210912015740.GJ13220@brightrain.aerifal.cx>

Hi Rich,

On Sun, 12 Sept 2021 at 10:57, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 06:08:58PM +0900, Daniel Palmer wrote:
> Hi. I see there's a situation that needs my attention here. I will
> plan to review and merge anything important/blocking that doesn't have
> problems this week.

Great. If you want to have it tested on real hardware please let me know.
I have an ecovec24 (SH4A) board connected to CI so I can easily build
and boot test.

> At the same time, I am open to the possibility of a new maintainer or
> co-maintainer if that ends up being what makes sense. Are there any
> candidates?

I think the problem is that while there are hobbyists out there the
number of people that are still familiar with how the SuperH stuff
works is pretty low.
I don't have the debug dongles etc anymore so if some treewide change
breaks everything then I don't know how I'd debug it.
Maybe we could add a few people that still have working hardware as
reviewers so they see patches and build test them for you?

Cheers,

Daniel