From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1758180Ab2INWRy (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 14 Sep 2012 18:17:54 -0400
Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]:56679 "EHLO
	mail-lb0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755639Ab2INWRu (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 14 Sep 2012 18:17:50 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5053A993.8090408@calxeda.com>
References: <20120914173813.fa65528e5236bd0a20c29b92@canb.auug.org.au>
	<505363BA.1010604@xenotime.net>
	<5053A993.8090408@calxeda.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 23:17:48 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: zct6hzqp9oIuTfgTvxW29-_luo4
Message-ID: <CAFtxgO5yfDd5bGVZ0a_zTQBZpEKFfJG5UMw03jKSxwbgYnNNZA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 14 (sata_highhbank)
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Mark Langsdorf
<mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com> wrote:
> Fix patch follows. Do I need to submit it as a separate patch or is this
> sufficient?

You appear to have submitted it as a separate patch just now ;p

Will queue and push to libata-dev.git#upstream (and thus linux-next)

      Jeff