From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C651C55186 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B4D520CC7 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="HS3L0RvS" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728148AbgDXAAQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 20:00:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48388 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727927AbgDXAAQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 20:00:16 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x244.google.com (mail-lj1-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::244]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B3D3C09B043 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:00:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x244.google.com with SMTP id b2so8100489ljp.4 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:00:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3AO2zDYw2OTrVTsEOf9qOCAlkKJ6vVvcI1aCDMu2ZHI=; b=HS3L0RvS4J2AHu7yfa/WS299UPIfdIbz/WFwgftGS6ioGesdU8JDJpiCx8KTLRhzpA Sfr0mHYtsT0QNWyBvlx8aWk4NH51uEI07Sr1zkBRpg2pGcz3a3lRSpCoqLAgwInRrt2P J2Jv3rZreCwePGwxg5ozt4xBt6eUBnW1Am+tGXtZBNVX8gRgNeIyGZE6gjHpmMmjMR7a OqPZfZcjampppdtDZ8OBwmW1hsnnK++hHZHP2GyH0qVPUsaBj5DiTrxhcwv6AWkYBiO8 FSfcdCtwihfWI8gehyCoCkUNA6Y7H9x6+q9r5a3ae6cNP056qNWkhKgJrrrI2dzM2wch SRZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3AO2zDYw2OTrVTsEOf9qOCAlkKJ6vVvcI1aCDMu2ZHI=; b=A3ZyIaN/37Lpb+YXb0YH2i6o2VQTQMS6QeCk2vg04MptGnnpXsiU1fk0yt58KZGd78 GjXBgDsVQ340m1uQMYjEA9BRehAUn3FOrAQ1l0zqMjuz6ziuUesVSRAWrQAf7XHy4lF0 fqi5AXEQ17U8e4ztCG25Nvnvd/n9FKQza68cqOrOFT9HwCh5abFFLLRh2joDCww48Tsf BXtd3rxaoBTbiWWwpaSlVwNEbq1GKOUQBM3w3rfshPm9QZ1fRU4RPFDvULYaxSRb7M2m R4CA5xYYrz9PL2RWFmKsYbXrD6669ylXsEiBHrk2UXmm1MMF8NNr0oOF02S1LxjBWlaO yQNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pua7udtSy3yzp7TWDdPdnevWAKGWDAz7qSzBYPaoy7GEaym8gsbT Q5cX6iZJRTqAf+Kl1gCR1Q1MNV8PvTz0f75b1+qnwiniSAA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypK+4462/UiJw2zVslTXnFJSdEZhNkC9wnzz+Q8zSaEjmCsx8aWyreNA0I93TTjbrrEaBN7JVQiJAfn44Wb6CKA= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:87d3:: with SMTP id v19mr3762634ljj.176.1587686413751; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:00:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jann Horn Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 01:59:47 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.16 000/245] 3.16.83-rc1 review To: Ben Hutchings Cc: kernel list , stable , Linus Torvalds , Guenter Roeck , Andrew Morton , Denis Kirjanov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 1:03 AM Ben Hutchings wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.16.83 release. > There are 245 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Tue Apr 28 18:00:00 UTC 2020. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Can you please add backports of the following patches? I asked for that in , but I guess that fell through the cracks somehow. 8019ad13ef7f64be44d4f892af9c840179009254 "futex: Fix inode life-time issue" 8d67743653dce5a0e7aa500fcccb237cde7ad88e "futex: Unbreak futex hashing" Can those still go into 3.16.83, or is it too late for that now?