From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21CCEC43331 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:56:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EFB20774 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="QxhaqVRq" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727751AbgCXQ4o (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:56:44 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f68.google.com ([209.85.167.68]:41541 "EHLO mail-lf1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727382AbgCXQ4o (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:56:44 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f68.google.com with SMTP id z23so2132760lfh.8 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:56:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XFIGNUpDtx5h3b6b+QEOb2QoBDkARJdMv8Frt7I6mcA=; b=QxhaqVRqxE0tPjxrjiFFHwiVs8u2p615mXSrju0U3UuWgoLLYUWEQU+OKjgjF53E9c q5jtVRTHsvMjYvRETJyKjbrLGxHHYT278X1y0HsDX/H+j7Tq8y25cJmSkPVjbnclwjOH Y6XGY+xWWe229Z8UWWIo1D/YiQ9kPJC5idX6IFKK/1MZtnKtL2TXRieh3d08F2EI2PWT AfWmBbNVlKl0O+Gy7tLu+op1tpAXWzcSVj53v2/JJjS3GKfGybabnAsy9OaQ6/5bP/QQ CpGjLqa9p84STUG0co/tM5DY38XvrfrMhoE3ofKqSBC2JtAuuDkr1DXqPTEFYJNqNK/U CtTw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XFIGNUpDtx5h3b6b+QEOb2QoBDkARJdMv8Frt7I6mcA=; b=YdMqO30cSfQldLHFHf5FZ21fFusHb/Slhmqnz/P5cxApOx/t1yzmhXFsPrtFCrJC1J MXtd7uQ4xqKUXpodlkwmNiAYVd45jv0cpdlYzUh/OiZLpSR/zhe/+JLZNcqZNb8lPriR tWGBwd9/5RhwqRhie+79aBx1VWNwb13AgIe1BPHtHj4WtC+VqG1g2xnVIx7h/15xaePL bwAg4UzT9465Rzf63V/3I8z9cwaTVfzYclFHCee3sIA3/wyT0XPrSMcm+01LHLa38z8m Nf5iTH5QZi8kPEoIugc8JOSxjWf0Ytctnd5t6jghZ60eLY4Dw6Pj5K3yaPwd7RHQSFAt uxGA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1p+lTcsZ3DaEdAaCnYMqaL5TVVaKzb5VQ1eo6N3mSoiCq9frri Ebvx2qvGIvnbF8KQKEP5W5o5SowupGeA5k85r/nzeQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vv3k8ZkJQxHJmVmXT2nkkdi7lVh9FsmwbzVxxYv13+3VtTq5l/toW1odvSLvnTLqAuk7oiHpfiw6M+O+7TBNRI= X-Received: by 2002:a19:ad43:: with SMTP id s3mr10218645lfd.63.1585069002228; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:56:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200324153643.15527-1-will@kernel.org> <20200324153643.15527-4-will@kernel.org> <20200324165128.GS20696@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> In-Reply-To: <20200324165128.GS20696@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> From: Jann Horn Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:56:15 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/21] list: Annotate lockless list primitives with data_race() To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Will Deacon , kernel list , Eric Dumazet , Kees Cook , Maddie Stone , Marco Elver , "Paul E . McKenney" , Thomas Gleixner , kernel-team , Kernel Hardening , Oleg Nesterov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:51 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 03:36:25PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > diff --git a/include/linux/list.h b/include/linux/list.h > > index 4fed5a0f9b77..4d9f5f9ed1a8 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/list.h > > +++ b/include/linux/list.h > > @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static inline int list_is_last(const struct list_head *list, > > */ > > static inline int list_empty(const struct list_head *head) > > { > > - return READ_ONCE(head->next) == head; > > + return data_race(READ_ONCE(head->next) == head); > > } > > list_empty() isn't lockless safe, that's what we have > list_empty_careful() for. That thing looks like it could also use some READ_ONCE() sprinkled in...