From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S941293AbcIHKUU (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2016 06:20:20 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f48.google.com ([209.85.218.48]:36469 "EHLO mail-oi0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934229AbcIHKUR (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2016 06:20:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160908061219.GK18398@leon.nu> References: <1472632647-1525-1-git-send-email-pandit.parav@gmail.com> <1472632647-1525-2-git-send-email-pandit.parav@gmail.com> <20160831093836.GC3694@leon.nu> <20160908061219.GK18398@leon.nu> From: Parav Pandit Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 15:50:15 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCHv12 1/3] rdmacg: Added rdma cgroup controller To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , Doug Ledford , Christoph Hellwig , Liran Liss , "Hefty, Sean" , Jason Gunthorpe , Haggai Eran , Jonathan Corbet , james.l.morris@oracle.com, serge@hallyn.com, Or Gerlitz , Matan Barak , Andrew Morton , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 08:37:23PM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote: >> Did you get a chance to review the series? > > We need to decide on fundamental question before reviewing it, which is > "how to fit rdmacg to new ABI model". >>From last discussion with Matan in this email thread, it appears that - only broken case are: (a) HW vendor driver specific resources (if they have crazy big list), which cannot be abstracted out well enough, won't be controlled by rdma cgroup. (b) Such resource objects are not well defined today with new ABI model. If such objects are well defined today, lets call them out and discuss with Doug, Tejun, Christoph and larger group, whether they qualify for inclusion or not. rdma cgroup currently supports including handful of HW resource that can be abstracted (at least at functionality level). Please include any other option issue, if any.