From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1995CC43215 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED16720715 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:24:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="qThZbChf" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726409AbfKNIYT (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 03:24:19 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f66.google.com ([209.85.210.66]:40750 "EHLO mail-ot1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725920AbfKNIYS (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 03:24:18 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f66.google.com with SMTP id m15so4138400otq.7 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:24:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=w40CyROdbhEGnEjb3+LNbwGjl3SSGgfFFSofpoToFUM=; b=qThZbChfueqA8geQJQth/pYRoMkko/v7LaMttggXVh7wli9Jgu1V3g20kXHf7L3WMv vdeeXw2VydDZT8RP1jpmK64FIL7vaNa8WcK73iw7lEPAxso7uESESmpFeV/YkjQnOzBj OOf/V0IFlK8J5Ojdq7nTGqvK0xRasy/q0V0AHygtWOMNznPKWZJhgMcTkc0fGlJwOf/o a9kj22A9LKYX8Do1Qsq/XHb7ZGcug3BshBHSJE6VUZuV1mHI04n01l/2OSgrY98mWBTx 2Owupv297hP+48bMtPRUmh4Vc+1+UW6KUu7DcRydeT86q+RWTX5r2J6LfI1ffVCljB7E 2zEg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=w40CyROdbhEGnEjb3+LNbwGjl3SSGgfFFSofpoToFUM=; b=nll4PIRlIzlgbk7m4P63LvhJ0qumYSsDjnfMo6npRl/vr/GFSOBVgbPqaPcAPUnADT 1khawJxa3G8K5zo7yjeI+sXxKQrYQ6gJeFSG/DzaBebWibCzRI0m9DwgofBfuleRvuH3 yqfmIclGJsUpvyJNYjKlwRZLTU/8PwUBOsxlJHVWzwo2E5LrbXRa9fFny9sF1Kf4mkQ9 lG7V4N1YPFcMy8erkbt8YkHNGg+7S70x/gPg7Jllv74cu1I1rvVuM02yvjskUkr2sh7P eEJl1ILsFqHnPy9M3XJ9uXyNtqXlSVlRVR7GPQE0rHZ2RKDVPPK5jsSFN7YEseRHc/Et aHhg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXi1k9fvQnaA82Oi2cTzVL/me0LDbnl40gZM6SKvIUvXGP4Ck8z BbCUjlE3SVAIfbeLBSvl+a+W8h5ImHDKLMx4zWXo+g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx4/q1HK8mVj3VNaG/0yZ1QJLN3UhO09pQOutLvCOpK7tuoXAJisdjP3+p6T+X61OaNRPwCMAKUT1MLwkDZTsQ= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:648f:: with SMTP id g15mr6685154otl.195.1573719857367; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:24:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190724014222.110767-1-saravanak@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Saravana Kannan Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:23:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add required-opps support to devfreq passive gov To: Chanwoo Choi Cc: MyungJoo Ham , Kyungmin Park , Viresh Kumar , Nishanth Menon , Stephen Boyd , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Sibi Sankar , Android Kernel Team , Linux PM , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:48 PM Chanwoo Choi wrote: > > Dear Saravana, > > Any other progress of this series? Hi Chanwoo, Thanks for checking. I haven't abandoned this patch series. This patch series depends on "lazy linking" of required-opps to avoid a cyclic dependency between devfreq and OPP table population. But Viresh wasn't happy with my implementation of the lazy liking for reasonable reasons. I had a chat with Viresh during one of the several conferences that I met him at. To fix the lazy linking in the way he wanted it meant we had to fix other issues in the OPP framework that arise when OPP tables are shared in DT but not in memory. So he was kind enough to sign up to add lazy linking support to OPPs so that I won't have to do it. So, I'm waiting on that. So once that's added, I should be able to drop a few patches in this series, do some minor updates and then this will be good to go. Thanks, Saravana