archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saravana Kannan <>
To: Rob Herring <>,
	Mark Rutland <>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,
	Frank Rowand <>
	<>, LKML <>,
	Android Kernel Team <>
Subject: Adding depends-on DT binding to break cyclic dependencies
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 23:54:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)

Hi Rob,

Frank, Greg and I got together during ELC and had an extensive and
very productive discussion about my "postboot supplier state cleanup"
patch series [1]. The three of us are on the same page now -- the
series as it stands is the direction we want to go in, with some minor
refactoring, documentation and naming changes.

However, one of the things Frank is concerned about (and Greg and I
agree) in the current patch series is that the "cyclic dependency
breaking" logic has been pushed off to individual drivers using the
edit_links() callback.

The concern being, there are going to be multiple device specific ad
hoc implementations to break a cyclic dependency. Also, if a device
can be part of a cyclic dependency, the driver for that device has to
check for specific system/products in which the device is part of a
cyclic dependency (because it might not always be part of a cycle),
and then potentially have cycle/product specific code to break the
cycle (since the cycle can be different on each system/product).

One way to avoid all of the device/driver specific code and simplify
my patch series by a non-trivial amount would be by adding a
"depends-on" DT binding that can ONLY be used to break cycles. We can
document it as such and reject any attempts to use it for other
purposes. When a depends-on property is present in a device node, that
specific device's supplier list will be parsed ONLY from the
depends-on property and the other properties won't be parsed for
deriving dependency information for that device.

Frank, Greg and I like this usage model for a new depends-on DT
binding. Is this something you'd be willing to accept?


[1] -

             reply	other threads:[~2019-08-22  6:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-22  6:54 Saravana Kannan [this message]
2019-08-27 20:18 ` Adding depends-on DT binding to break cyclic dependencies Saravana Kannan
2019-08-29 16:28 ` Rob Herring
2019-08-30  4:58   ` Saravana Kannan
2019-08-30 14:34     ` Rob Herring
2019-08-31  0:32       ` Saravana Kannan
2019-08-31  5:01         ` Saravana Kannan
2020-02-20  7:03           ` Saravana Kannan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).