From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751138AbbLUGvg (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2015 01:51:36 -0500 Received: from mail-vk0-f48.google.com ([209.85.213.48]:34802 "EHLO mail-vk0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750863AbbLUGvf (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2015 01:51:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1450451196.19539.9.camel@mtksdaap41> References: <1450412497-25872-1-git-send-email-djkurtz@chromium.org> <1450451196.19539.9.camel@mtksdaap41> From: Daniel Kurtz Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:51:14 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0Q3EUjrshLHD26moCorO97bSR74 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: convert to arch_initcall To: Yingjoe Chen Cc: Fabio Estevam , Maoguang Meng , Axel Lin , Hongzhou Yang , Linus Walleij , Patrice Chotard , open list , Fabian Frederick , "open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM" , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" , Matthias Brugger , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Yingjoe Chen wrote: > On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 12:21 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote: >> Move pinctrl initialization earlier in boot so that real devices can find >> their pctldev without probe deferring. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz >> --- >> drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt6397.c | 2 +- >> drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt8127.c | 2 +- >> drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt8135.c | 2 +- >> drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt8173.c | 2 +- >> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt6397.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt6397.c >> index f9751ae..a3780d4 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt6397.c >> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt6397.c >> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static int __init mtk_pinctrl_init(void) >> return platform_driver_register(&mtk_pinctrl_driver); >> } >> >> -module_init(mtk_pinctrl_init); >> +arch_initcall(mtk_pinctrl_init); > > > MT6397 is PMIC, which depends on pwrap on main AP to work. Since > pmic-wrap itself is module_platform_driver, I think it make sense to > keep this one as module_init. Maybe adding a comment to explain why it > is different from others will help. I interpret this the other way - I think that since the PMIC wrapper provides a bus required for the system PMIC it should also be a builtin and use arch_initcall. WDYT? -Dan