From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FA4C43334 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 19:58:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231524AbiFXT6v (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2022 15:58:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49244 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231305AbiFXT6u (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2022 15:58:50 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52A3B794E1 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 12:58:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id fd6so4907668edb.5 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 12:58:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aYJrl/wB0ad9MyDM8wwvji/ZDuZftUz6c3QWw/c+yls=; b=Mu4aeU7G2lpQOAQQALgKApY2YNyyfwEim9iUgpMOsdAl20+ZMNrMNqs0Crqn5x1xQ5 cJVd276kM+uTsWqBkWgEyU+NTmQ2JyrwepHIrXIlG87uc0ivdULhX8P2B/XJjZ9xvXR+ VaKXl1xl6qnbNJRImCqY5AL7onNMSYPWaxEZywP1YHq3rPWuWaF8WzlAcaW8Rtc+rvFw Bu6byZ7S/5eXN9B47BgDM9ghOH2/aQIR33EdOUNGTHnIKWhQ30XNf3MZYvoJTMaACC3b Yne5oYE4/MzUwxEpZMpps5E0eFVMhTIZu9r9kqbgjlLLM0PF44aszFeHcCQ0+3pX5D/I JKZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aYJrl/wB0ad9MyDM8wwvji/ZDuZftUz6c3QWw/c+yls=; b=MOi+qLJsOt90TzIuHL4mcEm2nR7tctESSVdslru3gzuUVT9b3vfN+L5dz7n7ykbqqd i0tD2Koh0mxu3rKEyYGeYCE763uirp1as8XQYDUlP0mGp3hovjPc1wIaH9U7HWwTjEk+ tATEC7kn4MIGdG1hI0kbyfSkeJDBKrNH1AuUCYaouAZJ1foiYLyDcskwN8HyYtMdBblZ nJ67X360fXCwT/aqsMZs8TSqGS0Zf0LBNC4ntUaH3Z+DpVagv8J4dpppJ/ANzaJLwZ8a mF3AqB1DPZmKWRSSmZVImKXin9wBghDkYO0fxdLZ48+eOUDpWMCWUfsvarvZ9MfKU7I4 sNQg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+lEGhh4wDcj68YqD82+fnKMrptz4KHZrRw9wRgn9J62veFGqmQ 9yWBIjnMoLKWhzVw7SqTeUuMAkkrhvAbpT0cX7nBAQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vMzUWJmQCrglTjFheFdJbmfy02e1iBg6c4g/gixoMi/cMSAyDijx+4ELbZ/YQ5KVXE686/xx+qFt4WhiSVHRQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5188:b0:437:618c:c124 with SMTP id q8-20020a056402518800b00437618cc124mr946758edd.233.1656100727779; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 12:58:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220603195626.121922-1-dlatypov@google.com> <87pmix3ktq.fsf@meer.lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <87pmix3ktq.fsf@meer.lwn.net> From: Daniel Latypov Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 12:58:36 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Documentation: kunit: remove duplicate kunit-tool.rst To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: brendanhiggins@google.com, davidgow@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 12:47 PM Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > Daniel Latypov writes: > > > The information is duplicated now in run_wrapper.rst, which was added in > > commit 46201d47d6c4 ("Documentation: kunit: Reorganize documentation > > related to running tests"). > > > > You cna compare these pages here: > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.18/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.html > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.18/dev-tools/kunit/kunit-tool.html > > > > We should have deleted it in then but it got overlooked. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov > > So not that long ago these patches were going through Shuah...it seems > that's not happening anymore? I can pick up kunit docs patches, > certainly. I've taken the silence on these as assent and applied them. Thanks! Tbh, I'm not really sure what the status is either. I saw that 46201d47d6c4 (which added the duplication) went through the docs tree, so I followed suit for this. I've been guilty of sending purely doc patches through Shuah/-kselftest tree before, but that was mostly when there were code change dependencies. If it makes it simpler, we could try and agree that all kunit doc patches go through Shuah going forward? Shuah, Bredan: thoughts/opinions? Daniel