From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S941972AbdAHFOs (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2017 00:14:48 -0500 Received: from mail-qt0-f195.google.com ([209.85.216.195]:33072 "EHLO mail-qt0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933287AbdAHFOl (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2017 00:14:41 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: cwchoi00@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20170107124026.gl447hl5bucdflyk@jack.zhora.eu> References: <20170106134350.32428-1-andi.shyti@samsung.com> <20170106134350.32428-6-andi.shyti@samsung.com> <20170107124026.gl447hl5bucdflyk@jack.zhora.eu> From: Chanwoo Choi Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 14:14:20 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] arm64: dts: exynos: Add tm2 touchkey node To: Andi Shyti Cc: Andi Shyti , Dmitry Torokhov , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Javier Martinez Canillas , Chanwoo Choi , Beomho Seo , linux-arm-kernel , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, devicetree , linux-kernel , linux-samsung-soc , Jaechul Lee , Jaechul Lee Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andi, 2017-01-07 21:40 GMT+09:00 Andi Shyti : > Hi Chanwoo, > >> >>> + touchkey@20 { >> >>> + compatible = "samsung,tm2-touchkey"; >> >>> + reg = <0x20>; >> >>> + interrupt-parent = <&gpa3>; >> >>> + interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>; >> >>> + vcc-supply = <&ldo32_reg>; >> >>> + vdd-supply = <&ldo33_reg>; >> >>> + }; >> >>> +}; >> >>> + >> >>> &ldo31_reg { >> >>> regulator-name = "TSP_VDD_1.85V_AP"; >> >>> regulator-min-microvolt = <1850000>; >> >> I repiled the touchkey driver against compatible name. >> Usually, when developing the device driver, we use the specific h/w name >> but in this patch, the touckey dt node uses the h/w board name instead of >> original touckhey name. > > this should be a device specifically done for the tm2 and we are > not sure who is the manufacturer of the device. In order to not As I knew, this touchkey was made by Cypress semiconductor. But, for more correct information, you may try to find it. > assign the device to the wrong manufacturer, we preferred calling > it Samsung as it is in a Samsung device. As you mentioned, Samsung made not this touchkey device. It is certainly wrong manufacturer. I have not seen to use the h/w board name as the peripheral device name. I don't prefer to use the inaccurate manufacturer and device name. -- Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi