linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:12:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jK4G=7icnxvLf0B93eq1X+ZDO5S4uJUULcDGgmzUmtPdw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170619145049.38dc14030059786ef6ca6a54@linux-foundation.org>

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 13:26:20 -0700 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Here are the outstanding fixes for CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE, along with Daniel's
>> v5 patch and a tweak from me to add CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_FORTIFY_SOURCE to avoid
>> failing the build on architectures that have not hunted down all the needed
>> fixes yet.
>>
>> This was in my for-next/kspp tree, but since it depends on fixes in other
>> trees, the preference is for these to all get carried in -mm instead of
>> in KSPP.
>
> All the patches you sent are already in -next (from the kspp tree?) so
> I can't use them.

Err... that's what you asked me to send? And I had removed them from
kspp so you could carry them.

>> The extra needed fixes in -next are:
>>
>>         scsi: csiostor: Avoid content leaks and casts
>>         arm64, vdso: Define vdso_{start,end} as array
>>         staging/rts5208: Fix read overflow in memcpy
>>         libertas: Avoid reading past end of buffer
>>         ray_cs: Avoid reading past end of buffer
>
> These didn't get sent out?

These are all already in -next from other non-kspp trees. I was just
trying to be complete about showing where all the needed fixes were.

> If the kspp tree is already in -next then how about leaving things that
> way, and send Linus a pull request for -rc1?

*sob* I'm happy to do that. I just want you and sfr to agree. :P If I
carry them in my kspp tree, it'll depend on -next (which I'm fine
with, but sfr does not like).

I can add it all back to kspp, just let me what you both can agree on. :P

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-19 22:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-19 20:26 [PATCH 0/7] CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE Kees Cook
2017-06-19 20:26 ` [PATCH 1/7] efi: Avoid fortify checks in EFI stub Kees Cook
2017-06-19 20:26 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86/power/64: Use char arrays for asm function names Kees Cook
2017-06-19 20:26 ` [PATCH 3/7] kexec_file: Adjust declaration of kexec_purgatory Kees Cook
2017-06-19 20:26 ` [PATCH 4/7] IB/rxe: Do not copy extra stack memory to skb Kees Cook
2017-06-19 20:26 ` [PATCH 5/7] powerpc: Don't fortify prom_init Kees Cook
2017-06-19 20:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] powerpc: Make feature-fixup tests fortify-safe Kees Cook
2017-06-19 20:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] include/linux/string.h: add the option of fortified string.h functions Kees Cook
2017-09-10 10:55   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-09-10 13:51     ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-06-19 21:50 ` [PATCH 0/7] CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE Andrew Morton
2017-06-19 22:12   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2017-06-19 22:31     ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGXu5jK4G=7icnxvLf0B93eq1X+ZDO5S4uJUULcDGgmzUmtPdw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=danielmicay@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).