From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>,
Akihiro Suda <suda.akihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
Tom Hromatka <tom.hromatka@oracle.com>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>, Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] seccomp: add a return code to trap to userspace
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:49:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKBmej+fXhEc+Jy7Guy+vXEZkHnc=4LNm1NNEsc1=DFVA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXeZZfVzXh7SwKhyB=+ySDk5fhrrdrXrcABsQ=JpQT7Tg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 9:19 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 01:09:20PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 2:49 AM, Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws> wrote:
>>> I wonder if this communication should be netlink, which gives a more
>>> well-structured way to describe what's on the wire? The reason I ask
>>> is because if we ever change the seccomp_data structure, we'll now
>>> have two places where we need to deal with it (the first being within
>>> the BPF itself). My initial idea was to prefix the communication with
>>> a size field, then send the structure, and then I had nightmares, and
>>> realized this was basically netlink reinvented.
>>
>> I suggested netlink in LA, and everyone (especially Andy) groaned very
>> loudly :). I'm happy to switch it to netlink if you like, although i
>> think memcpy() of structs should be safe here, since the return value
>> from read or write can indicate the size of things.
>
> I could easily get on board with "netlink" (i.e. NLA) messages sent
> over an fd. I will object strongly to the use of netlink *sockets*.
Yeah, I was thinking NLA over the fd; not a netlink socket.
>>> An ERRNO filter would block a USER_NOTIF because it's unconditional.
>>> TRACE could be either, USER_NOTIF could be either.
>>>
>>> This means TRACE rules would be bumped by a USER_NOTIF... hmm.
>>
>> Yes, I didn't exactly know what to do here. ERRNO, TRAP, and KILL all
>> seemed more important than USER_NOTIF, but TRACE didn't. I don't have
>> a strong opinion about what to do here, because users can adjust their
>> filters accordingly. Let me know what you prefer.
>
> If we switched to eBPF functions, this whole issue goes away.
Yeah, though we'd still need some kind of "wait for answer" eBPF
function. It feels wrong to re-use maps for that...
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-27 0:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-04 10:49 [RFC 0/3] seccomp trap to userspace Tycho Andersen
2018-02-04 10:49 ` [RFC 1/3] seccomp: add a return code to " Tycho Andersen
2018-02-04 17:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-02-04 20:01 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-02-04 20:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-02-05 8:47 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-02-13 21:09 ` Kees Cook
2018-02-14 15:29 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-02-14 17:19 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-02-14 17:23 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-02-15 14:48 ` Christian Brauner
2018-02-27 0:49 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2018-02-27 3:27 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-02-04 10:49 ` [RFC 2/3] seccomp: hoist out filter resolving logic Tycho Andersen
2018-02-13 21:29 ` Kees Cook
2018-02-14 15:33 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-02-04 10:49 ` [RFC 3/3] seccomp: add a way to get a listener fd from ptrace Tycho Andersen
2018-02-13 21:32 ` Kees Cook
2018-02-14 15:33 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-03-15 16:09 ` [RFC 0/3] seccomp trap to userspace Christian Brauner
2018-03-15 16:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-03-15 17:05 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2018-03-15 17:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-03-15 17:25 ` Christian Brauner
2018-03-15 17:30 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-03-15 17:35 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-03-16 0:46 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-03-16 14:47 ` Christian Brauner
2018-03-16 16:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-03-16 16:40 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGXu5jKBmej+fXhEc+Jy7Guy+vXEZkHnc=4LNm1NNEsc1=DFVA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
--cc=sargun@sargun.me \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=suda.akihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=tom.hromatka@oracle.com \
--cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
--cc=tyhicks@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).