From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB07C43331 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 09:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5272072E for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 09:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="AsedCKJm" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387780AbgDBJOa (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2020 05:14:30 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:41790 "EHLO mail-wr1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387477AbgDBJOa (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2020 05:14:30 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id h9so3252248wrc.8 for ; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 02:14:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7oO5ojwsmMbiz9bV8lc0KuGAlbZ9cZsYY465AETTzhw=; b=AsedCKJmk3zh2162AWk03RYYnuwMu43SqSyMa22CuDwuKeBsqYZ/ZpnbkpH9ozYkzi UdXHImrAQuck55VmiVaUc2Nh40UFymzSnq12eRdEMV2fCGw5xg3RIKi87r7RIsrkhjOV FmI7Yf200tOGPV1eG5J30GDQiQTVsMJ4Bndl1DYtAe6hC17/LXNjtlyfa8UFMdkFToWZ hcc13K0AEdtmoH0CvI/oH7xvQVljRKJ4Zh1YV4BLdsVHZaG+zqt+GyJYnqB4Z/VJoLQP cF/eh3b7QZAbGi9mDpyj18Tjbz9WZdwsbY5+ih/eofyYe/IlJsptXWGbm/Ee+gYLYeEF VOZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7oO5ojwsmMbiz9bV8lc0KuGAlbZ9cZsYY465AETTzhw=; b=LPmiPyEjuHMkxEIetjGEusQPL+/nHuwlPg71DcngdByj6M3YCpstgYNAaKhOiG2Hnb tj8Pwk5jcYymhvjL8BOrbFhYRMM3/EZFYSnmAJDPE+YqkjpOGndUwLEvQ5W191SI3s14 BxVBtlhQwwXfNUELOeZXqVBP6mnbkFXkc4Et5BZW6wcQ7UHgS7ilw2Keyo+ay29NmO21 X4TgvFPTnRxUIlA146lOGtmfZP+uNlAna/nP+jFwjP5vavzuBtFCpWZ02X0FlwQRbLNw I4vEYC5IbPD7UbWb08e8pFIxpRiYh75jDklnCYfJckgNYjcY6CDZRZ9MRZNZHcvslWIv KG7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZbsp45b/UjpxAXiG6bXxABF7Waxx7OYBLi+NALUs04HJZDpVgR /zATdhLHFms2VLfjUSZA3ULafCXMRYvXKG2i1P8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKwMvEoXZrpaQ4HZtkwJZMlk/p+Ce1lVBXhTtTkZk8wqF0d2jH6KErb2sML3hZjLYmwCQ9w8019RNXG/6FVFXI= X-Received: by 2002:adf:ff8b:: with SMTP id j11mr2592490wrr.117.1585818868271; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 02:14:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200305233231.174082-1-leonardo@linux.ibm.com> <33333c2ffe9fedbee252a1731d7c10cd3308252b.camel@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <33333c2ffe9fedbee252a1731d7c10cd3308252b.camel@linux.ibm.com> From: Bharata B Rao Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:44:17 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] powerpc/kernel: Enables memory hot-remove after reboot on pseries guests To: Leonardo Bras Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Allison Randal , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Nathan Fontenot , Thomas Gleixner , Michael Anderson , Mike Rapoport , Claudio Carvalho , Hari Bathini , Christophe Leroy , Bharata B Rao , linuxppc-dev , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 8:38 PM Leonardo Bras wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 20:32 -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote: > > --- > > The new flag was already proposed on Power Architecture documentation, > > and it's waiting for approval. > > > > I would like to get your comments on this change, but it's still not > > ready for being merged. > > New flag got approved on the documentation. > Please review this patch. Looks good to me, also tested with PowerKVM guests. Reviewed-by: Bharata B Rao Regards, Bharata. -- http://raobharata.wordpress.com/