From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754116Ab3F0V2X (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 27 Jun 2013 17:28:23 -0400
Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:42557 "EHLO
	mail-we0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752933Ab3F0V2V (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 27 Jun 2013 17:28:21 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGa+x87SZyOU3SWcBEUGKzke8whbHhudRzsj0VjgGU_VkhnJZA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1370519244-49918-1-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com>
	<12642293.RmlRtOVM54@wuerfel>
	<20130619102141.411c8e39.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<201306192016.00659.arnd@arndb.de>
	<CAGa+x87SZyOU3SWcBEUGKzke8whbHhudRzsj0VjgGU_VkhnJZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:28:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGa+x85UP6_3n-m76w_NHMF5Ld-rEu+ufSbRbAE4RhdU7GuKnw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v11 resend 10/11] arm, change reboot_mode to use enum reboot_mode
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
        Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
        Arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 19 June 2013, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> This patchset gets a lot of rejects which I keep on fixing up.  Please
>>> merge up early in the merge window and compile-test (and review) the
>>> linux-next changes to make sure I didn't muck up the reject-fixing,
>>> then we should be fine.
>>
>> Ok, good. The patch below is what I used locally to get everything to
>> build. Please fold that into the larger patch.
>
> I'm still seeing build breaks in linux-next due to the original patch.
>
> Will the fix below from Arnd be folded into the original?

Actually, there's even more ARM build fallout from this patch not
covered by Arnd's fix.  For example, building the ixp4xx_defconfig now
has an include nesting mess[1] that is not a trivial fixup (at least
that I have found yet).

IMO, this patch needs to be dropped from -next until it gets better
build coverage testing on ARM.

Kevin

[1] https://ci.linaro.org/jenkins/job/khilman-kernel-arm-next/99/arch=arm,defconfig=ixp4xx_defconfig,label=kernel_cloud/consoleFull