From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966433AbcIHKYx (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2016 06:24:53 -0400 Received: from smtp.csie.ntu.edu.tw ([140.112.30.61]:42710 "EHLO smtp.csie.ntu.edu.tw" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966156AbcIHKYu (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2016 06:24:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <883333c3-5685-905f-3e96-2c2498a22b8a@redhat.com> References: <20160908031418.12627-1-wens@csie.org> <883333c3-5685-905f-3e96-2c2498a22b8a@redhat.com> From: Chen-Yu Tsai Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:24:24 +0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: sun4i-usb: Use spinlock to guard phyctl register access To: Hans de Goede Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Maxime Ripard , linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel , stable@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > > On 08-09-16 05:14, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> >> The musb driver calls into this phy driver to disable/enable squelch >> detection. This function was introduced in 24fe86a617c5 ("phy: sun4i-usb: >> Add a sunxi specific function for setting squelch-detect"). This >> function in turn calls sun4i_usb_phy_write, which uses a mutex to >> guard the common access register. Unfortunately musb does this >> in atomic context, which results in the following warning with lock >> debugging enabled: >> >> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at >> kernel/locking/mutex.c:97 >> in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 96, name: kworker/0:2 >> CPU: 0 PID: 96 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 4.8.0-rc4-00181-gd502f8ad1c3e >> #13 >> Hardware name: Allwinner sun8i Family >> Workqueue: events musb_deassert_reset >> [] (unwind_backtrace) from [] (show_stack+0xb/0xc) >> [] (show_stack) from [] (dump_stack+0x67/0x74) >> [] (dump_stack) from [] (mutex_lock+0x15/0x2c) >> [] (mutex_lock) from [] >> (sun4i_usb_phy_write+0x39/0xec) >> [] (sun4i_usb_phy_write) from [] >> (musb_port_reset+0xfb/0x184) >> [] (musb_port_reset) from [] >> (musb_deassert_reset+0x1f/0x2c) >> [] (musb_deassert_reset) from [] >> (process_one_work+0x129/0x2b8) >> [] (process_one_work) from [] >> (worker_thread+0xf3/0x424) >> [] (worker_thread) from [] (kthread+0xa1/0xb8) >> [] (kthread) from [] (ret_from_fork+0x11/0x20) >> >> Since the register access is mmio, we can use a spinlock to guard this >> specific access, rather than the mutex that guards the entire phy. >> >> Fixes: ba4bdc9e1dc0 ("PHY: sunxi: Add driver for sunxi usb phy") >> Cc: Hans de Goede >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai > > > Good catch, but you're actually replacing the locking calls in the only > user of sun4i_usb_phy_data.mutex, so after your patch it is no longer > used anywhere. Can you do a v2 just outright replacing it with a > spinlock please ? Ah. I misread the other use of mutex_lock, which is actually using the mutex in struct phy. Sure I'll just replace it. After sending this patch I wondered if I should have used spin_lock_irqsave though. ChenYu > > Thanks, > > Hans > > > > >> --- >> drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c | 8 ++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c b/drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c >> index fcf4d95ecc6d..ae4ac5457c64 100644 >> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c >> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c >> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ >> #include >> #include >> #include >> +#include >> #include >> #include >> >> @@ -115,6 +116,7 @@ struct sun4i_usb_phy_data { >> const struct sun4i_usb_phy_cfg *cfg; >> enum usb_dr_mode dr_mode; >> struct mutex mutex; >> + spinlock_t reg_lock; /* guard access to phyctl reg */ >> struct sun4i_usb_phy { >> struct phy *phy; >> void __iomem *pmu; >> @@ -183,7 +185,7 @@ static void sun4i_usb_phy_write(struct sun4i_usb_phy >> *phy, u32 addr, u32 data, >> void __iomem *phyctl = phy_data->base + >> phy_data->cfg->phyctl_offset; >> int i; >> >> - mutex_lock(&phy_data->mutex); >> + spin_lock(&phy_data->reg_lock); >> >> if (phy_data->cfg->type == sun8i_a33_phy || >> phy_data->cfg->type == sun50i_a64_phy) { >> @@ -221,7 +223,8 @@ static void sun4i_usb_phy_write(struct sun4i_usb_phy >> *phy, u32 addr, u32 data, >> >> data >>= 1; >> } >> - mutex_unlock(&phy_data->mutex); >> + >> + spin_unlock(&phy_data->reg_lock); >> } >> >> static void sun4i_usb_phy_passby(struct sun4i_usb_phy *phy, int enable) >> @@ -583,6 +586,7 @@ static int sun4i_usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device >> *pdev) >> return -ENOMEM; >> >> mutex_init(&data->mutex); >> + spin_lock_init(&data->reg_lock); >> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&data->detect, sun4i_usb_phy0_id_vbus_det_scan); >> dev_set_drvdata(dev, data); >> data->cfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev); >> >