From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD16C5CFE7 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:47:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5631A2089B for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:47:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5631A2089B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=csie.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933898AbeGJOrd (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 10:47:33 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f65.google.com ([209.85.208.65]:38865 "EHLO mail-ed1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933256AbeGJOra (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 10:47:30 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f65.google.com with SMTP id t2-v6so2175122edr.5; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:47:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=a4jfhzE4kpQaL1P6cyBArl58uZSwK/Q4anUEWZSANOI=; b=fiB2GwZMZsqNDvd8W+zPncV3ojpLXwR2uhk+05JD6zEX/ixIzE9+WWI+Tw7f/7pSuX sy6gszA2kdeUVNQbw+St+1uN5OgVLYF57ooEQJ1tK/M0faR6tZYrya+S6kRwqf6BlW/4 Wa7MN4oymhM2rS4K6ZxUskHNCZWKI2sk9k/ylvg41a87wB9o8UbFdD4sKSIxXcGP+rE1 QGO2aiigd6+9t5k6AnbD/U17t4XXfC6EEmoT5C5vV4FXv5mIAiBIOu04SrkUjq1UcZ6L URekuAADm8/6trAdpViYj1wNcDW5lFfmwmXqNJckyymW6dkhbUjlRgpGzN2OsxQ2Lfaf 2kjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3OIknp2yt+8MTg1Xl3oNw21VaioloI834XuCQLUUEGE7YHSVY5 9gpjUeLNYvdhzfm6H41u3j0cFyEV6i8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpdmCiF4/sEki2J93IkOY+Ix73SsSRY2BiSn2GTgeQzi7CfKa76rjEIsRiU+LuIER/C2EXkukw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d918:: with SMTP id a24-v6mr26411488edr.109.1531234048859; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:47:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com (mail-wr1-f41.google.com. [209.85.221.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g9-v6sm6293084edq.34.2018.07.10.07.47.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:47:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-f41.google.com with SMTP id r16-v6so14931860wrt.11; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:47:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:adf:e90c:: with SMTP id f12-v6mr17703902wrm.126.1531234047930; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:47:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:adf:a15a:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:47:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180710080114.31469-6-paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com> References: <20180710080114.31469-1-paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com> <20180710080114.31469-6-paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com> From: Chen-Yu Tsai Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 22:47:07 +0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/22] dt-bindings: sram: sunxi: Populate valid sections compatibles To: Paul Kocialkowski Cc: Linux Media Mailing List , devicetree , linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Maxime Ripard , Marco Franchi , Icenowy Zheng , Hans Verkuil , Keiichi Watanabe , Jonathan Corbet , Smitha T Murthy , Tom Saeger , Andrzej Hajda , "David S . Miller" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton , Randy Dunlap , Arnd Bergmann , Geert Uytterhoeven , Laurent Pinchart , Jacob Chen , Neil Armstrong , Benoit Parrot , Todor Tomov , Alexandre Courbot , Sakari Ailus , Andy Shevchenko , Pawel Osciak , Ricardo Ribalda Delgado , Hans de Goede , Sami Tolvanen , =?UTF-8?Q?Niklas_S=C3=B6derlund?= , linux-sunxi , Thomas Petazzoni , Hugues Fruchet , Randy Li Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 4:00 PM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > This adds a list of valid SRAM sections compatibles for the A13, A20, > A23 and H3 platforms. Per-platform compatibles are introduced for the > SRAM sections of these platforms, with the A10 compatibles also listed > as valid when applicable. > > In particular, compatibles for the C1 SRAM section are introduced. You should probably mention that this is not an exhaustive list. In particular, the C2 and C3 (sun5i) mappings are still missing. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/sram/sunxi-sram.txt | 25 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sunxi-sram.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sunxi-sram.txt > index 156a02ab6b54..07c53c5214a0 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sunxi-sram.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sunxi-sram.txt > @@ -32,8 +32,33 @@ once again the representation described in the mmio-sram binding. > > The valid sections compatible for A10 are: > - allwinner,sun4i-a10-sram-a3-a4 > + - allwinner,sun4i-a10-sram-c1 > - allwinner,sun4i-a10-sram-d > > +The valid sections compatible for A13 are: > + - allwinner,sun5i-a13-sram-a3-a4 > + - allwinner,sun4i-a10-sram-a3-a4 > + - allwinner,sun5i-a13-sram-c1 > + - allwinner,sun4i-a10-sram-c1 > + - allwinner,sun5i-a13-sram-d > + - allwinner,sun4i-a10-sram-d > + > +The valid sections compatible for A20 are: > + - allwinner,sun7i-a20-sram-a3-a4 > + - allwinner,sun4i-a10-sram-a3-a4 > + - allwinner,sun7i-a20-sram-c1 > + - allwinner,sun4i-a10-sram-c1 > + - allwinner,sun7i-a20-sram-d > + - allwinner,sun4i-a10-sram-d > + > +The valid sections compatible for A23/A33 are: > + - allwinner,sun8i-a23-sram-c1 > + - allwinner,sun4i-a10-sram-c1 > + > +The valid sections compatible for H3 are: > + - allwinner,sun8i-h3-sram-c1 > + - allwinner,sun4i-a10-sram-c1 I'm not quite sure why we want to list these... I think it makes more sense to just have the SoC specific compatible. They are tied to the controls after all. Maybe Rob has a different opinion? ChenYu > + > The valid sections compatible for A64 are: > - allwinner,sun50i-a64-sram-c > > -- > 2.17.1 >