From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756483AbdCXICo (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 04:02:44 -0400 Received: from smtp.csie.ntu.edu.tw ([140.112.30.61]:48980 "EHLO smtp.csie.ntu.edu.tw" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756100AbdCXICh (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 04:02:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <13f2f8ba-af9e-576e-24ee-60c3a1609f80@free-electrons.com> References: <20170320081653.8884-1-quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com> <20170320081653.8884-3-quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com> <20170323093527.ojcdpvruzqnhvysq@earth> <13f2f8ba-af9e-576e-24ee-60c3a1609f80@free-electrons.com> From: Chen-Yu Tsai Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 16:01:37 +0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 2/9] iio: adc: add support for X-Powers AXP20X and AXP22X PMICs ADCs To: Quentin Schulz Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , Sebastian Reichel , Mark Rutland , Thomas Petazzoni , devicetree , Lars-Peter Clausen , "open list:THERMAL" , Liam Breck , linux-sunxi , Russell King , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , Rob Herring , Icenowy Zheng , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , knaack.h@gmx.de, Maxime Ripard , Lee Jones , Jonathan Cameron , linux-arm-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Quentin Schulz wrote: > Hi, > > On 23/03/2017 10:52, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:34:45PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >>>> P.S. I'm thinking about having MFD_AXP20X imply its various sub-drivers. >>>> Not sure if that was the intended usage of the new imply syntax though. >>> >>> I think adding "default MFD_AXP20X" to the sub-drivers is cleaner, >>> as you will not end up with a long list. >> >> I'd still need to add imply statements for the various subsystems though, >> like regulators, power supplies, extcon, etc.. >> But I suppose that's cleaner, and fits the original intent of the syntax. >> > > Hum. I don't really understand what you are saying.. Am I supposed to > modify something or, is it okay and we're waiting for Lee to apply on > his tree? > > Thanks in advance for clearing it up, > > Quentin I'm just mentioning some follow up tasks I want to do. The patch is fine and we're waiting for Lee to take it. ChenYu