From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753117AbaEHDl1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2014 23:41:27 -0400 Received: from mail-ve0-f182.google.com ([209.85.128.182]:52446 "EHLO mail-ve0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752916AbaEHDlY (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2014 23:41:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140508031700.GO7047@lukather> References: <1399483554-8824-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1399483554-8824-8-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20140508031700.GO7047@lukather> From: Chen-Yu Tsai Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 11:40:59 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: cy7eaY5kDImjgDZu206gZhmoQZw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] ARM: sunxi: dt: add PRCM clk and reset controller subdevices To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Boris BREZILLON , =?UTF-8?Q?Emilio_L=C3=B3pez?= , Mike Turquette , Samuel Ortiz , Lee Jones , Philipp Zabel , Shuge , kevin , Hans de Goede , Randy Dunlap , devicetree , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel , dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 07:25:54PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote: >> Add DT definitions for PRCM (Power/Reset/Clock Management) clock and reset >> controller subdevices. >> >> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi >> index ec3253a..b69be0b 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi >> @@ -498,9 +498,46 @@ >> reg = <0x01f01c00 0x300>; >> }; >> >> - prcm@01f01c00 { >> + prcm@01f01400 { > > This has already been fixed by Hans. > >> compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-prcm"; >> reg = <0x01f01400 0x200>; >> + >> + ar100: ar100_clk { >> + compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ar100-clk"; >> + #clock-cells = <0>; >> + clocks = <&osc32k>, <&osc24M>, <&pll6>, <&pll6>; >> + }; >> + >> + ahb0: ahb0_clk { >> + compatible = "fixed-factor-clock"; >> + #clock-cells = <0>; >> + clock-div = <1>; >> + clock-mult = <1>; >> + clocks = <&ar100>; >> + clock-output-names = "ahb0"; >> + }; >> + >> + apb0: apb0_clk { >> + compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-apb0-clk"; >> + #clock-cells = <0>; >> + clocks = <&ahb0>; >> + clock-output-names = "apb0"; >> + }; >> + >> + apb0_gates: apb0_gates_clk { >> + compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-apb0-gates-clk"; >> + #clock-cells = <1>; >> + clocks = <&apb0>; >> + clock-output-names = "apb0_pio", "apb0_ir", >> + "apb0_timer01", "apb0_p2wi", > > timer01 ? is this a typo? A23 manual lists the clock gate as "r_timer0_1", so I put the name on the wiki. Allwinner sun6i code uses "r_tmr" or just "tmr". I see no problem naming this clock output as "apb0_timer" though. >> + "apb0_uart", "apb0_1wire", >> + "apb0_i2c"; >> + }; >> + >> + apb0_rst: apb0_rst { >> + compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-clock-reset"; >> + #reset-cells = <1>; >> + }; >> }; >> }; >> }; >> -- >> 1.8.3.2 >>