From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758632AbdCVEfN (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:35:13 -0400 Received: from smtp.csie.ntu.edu.tw ([140.112.30.61]:40078 "EHLO smtp.csie.ntu.edu.tw" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750908AbdCVEfL (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:35:11 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170320081653.8884-3-quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com> References: <20170320081653.8884-1-quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com> <20170320081653.8884-3-quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com> From: Chen-Yu Tsai Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:34:45 +0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 2/9] iio: adc: add support for X-Powers AXP20X and AXP22X PMICs ADCs To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Quentin Schulz , Sebastian Reichel , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Chen-Yu Tsai , Russell King , Maxime Ripard , knaack.h@gmx.de, Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Lee Jones , Icenowy Zheng , Liam Breck , Thomas Petazzoni , "open list:THERMAL" , devicetree , linux-kernel , linux-arm-kernel , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Quentin Schulz wrote: > The X-Powers AXP20X and AXP22X PMICs have multiple ADCs. They expose the > battery voltage, battery charge and discharge currents, AC-in and VBUS > voltages and currents, 2 GPIOs muxable in ADC mode and PMIC temperature. > > This adds support for most of AXP20X and AXP22X ADCs. > > Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz > Acked-by: Maxime Ripard > Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron This patch seems to depend on commit 4707274714ef ("mfd: axp20x: Correct name of temperature data ADC registers") currently in the mfd tree. Jonathan, would it be ok for Lee to take this patch through the mfd tree as well? Thanks ChenYu P.S. I'm thinking about having MFD_AXP20X imply its various sub-drivers. Not sure if that was the intended usage of the new imply syntax though.