From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B88ECDE46 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 20:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D78205F4 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 20:37:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 51D78205F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=csie.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727070AbeJYFGs (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:06:48 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f67.google.com ([209.85.208.67]:40039 "EHLO mail-ed1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725873AbeJYFGr (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:06:47 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f67.google.com with SMTP id r1-v6so6334702edd.7; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:37:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=X/rvii0iCV8LZe97kR0t93pWpIHHCGdJMYSNkWyGB28=; b=rRD4jiSpSy4dn8qK8WVVabgY+MZkyzTkwz6STazh13a5Pix2wW8+Ll5cPWrVS3Y8Ux ran728Yo/TK/w6FkiIz8b5yfYuzlIvegHMewXRCKFVsgFZYJsLAeZKzs4T/xfJpkxu41 khJzJSKQMx3GhjFU2OWVs+UPbdxh56roBFFIcRkS6yuA2ipz5AB3ywRMOCs1UpOch+8f A2KZlJYuFpWMH5Clsxy2i70/UClaF01Ali00icDx4hIyIqpLjvjOdVHfr6JcCkXjM/Mz zJYGwioug/3f5VpuqQgR4I52DSEDTi5vqPJaJCpXwHXJ7ovVNXrVIwmwMq+w0Id1LXHT V66Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJqv9QDiRD1yfGRL1iOOqylVdkAYL6k25XEoPTG2U5CXSFMIJTr yutED3MV+8Ud7Ffc73MKc09fwqYuLpc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cwGTjLw777OdxSx4TYRjl79mBOAlQjgnT0SQu6SdzR37AAe/lBmU4fjv+VZOeTMzfzpoViAA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6a13:: with SMTP id o19-v6mr2021354ejr.99.1540413432944; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:37:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wr1-f47.google.com (mail-wr1-f47.google.com. [209.85.221.47]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g13-v6sm1500945edp.46.2018.10.24.13.37.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:37:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-f47.google.com with SMTP id d2-v6so6983181wro.7; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:37:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a5d:53d1:: with SMTP id a17-v6mr1207752wrw.41.1540413430140; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:37:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181023155035.9101-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> <20181023155035.9101-11-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> <20181024180754.pfae27y6i7jhcdgy@flea> In-Reply-To: <20181024180754.pfae27y6i7jhcdgy@flea> From: Chen-Yu Tsai Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 21:36:57 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/15] dt-bindings: panel: Add Bananapi S070WV20-CT16 ICN6211 MIPI-DSI to RGB bridge To: Jagan Teki Cc: Maxime Ripard , Icenowy Zheng , Jernej Skrabec , Vasily Khoruzhick , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , David Airlie , dri-devel , Mike Turquette , Stephen Boyd , linux-clk , Michael Trimarchi , linux-arm-kernel , devicetree , linux-kernel , linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:08 PM Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 09:20:30PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > Bananapi S070WV20-CT16 ICN6211 is 800x480, 4-lane MIPI-DSI to RGB bridge panel, > > the same panel PCB comes with parallel RBG which is supported via > > panel-simple driver with "bananapi,s070wv20-ct16" compatible. > > > > But this binding is specific for MIPI DSI to RGB bridge panels, > > which usually accessed using MIPI DSI controller driver. > > > > for information: > > - "bananapi,s070wv20-ct16" compatible for parallel RGB panels > > - "bananapi,s070wv20-ct16-icn6211" compatible for MIPI-DSI to RGB > > bridge panels > > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki > > Why not just reusing the same binding document? Agreed. Just put the MIPI-DSI-specific information you added here into the existing document. Rob suggested that we could even use the same compatible. That would make sense if you are modelling the entire panel + PCB as a module, instead of a panel node + a bridge node as I originally wanted. Don't worry, I gave it some thought and I think having a single combined panel node makes more sense. ChenYu