linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>,
	Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] staging: fieldbus: anybus-s: force endiannes annotation
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 09:32:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGngYiVSg86X+jD+hgwwrOYX82Fu3OWSLygwGFzyc9wYq6AesQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190430041934.GI23075@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 12:19 AM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> ... not that there's much sense keeping ->fieldbus_type in host-endian,
> while we are at it.

Interesting! Suppose we make device->fieldbus_type bus-endian.
Then the endinan-ness conversion either needs to happen in
bus_match() (and we'd have to convert endianness each time
this function is called).
Or, we make driver->fieldbus_type bus-endian also, then there
is no need for conversion... but the driver writer has to remember
to specify this in bus endianness:

static struct anybuss_client_driver profinet_driver = {
        .probe = ...,
        .fieldbus_type = endian convert?? (0x0089),
};

Which pushes bus implementation details onto the
client driver writer? Also, how to convert a constant
to a specific endianness in a static initializer?

You never make a remark without good reason, so what
am I overlooking?

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-30 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-29  6:05 [PATCH V2] staging: fieldbus: anybus-s: force endiannes annotation Nicholas Mc Guire
2019-04-29  6:05 ` [PATCH V3] staging: fieldbus: anybus-s: consolidate wait_for_completion_timeout return handling Nicholas Mc Guire
2019-04-29 14:01   ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2019-04-29 14:03 ` [PATCH V2] staging: fieldbus: anybus-s: force endiannes annotation Sven Van Asbroeck
2019-04-30  2:22   ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2019-04-30  3:02     ` Al Viro
2019-04-30  3:33       ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2019-04-30  4:19         ` Al Viro
2019-04-30 13:32           ` Sven Van Asbroeck [this message]
2019-04-30 14:03             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-04-30 14:22               ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2019-04-30 14:26                 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2019-04-30 14:27             ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGngYiVSg86X+jD+hgwwrOYX82Fu3OWSLygwGFzyc9wYq6AesQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=thesven73@gmail.com \
    --cc=der.herr@hofr.at \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hofrat@osadl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).