From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E81C433E1 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 14:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252BD206E6 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 14:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="R9EoK0fa" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729444AbgGFO7r (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 10:59:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60684 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729222AbgGFO7q (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 10:59:46 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x343.google.com (mail-ot1-x343.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::343]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10E32C061755; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 07:59:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x343.google.com with SMTP id t18so19051816otq.5; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 07:59:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ly03rVdFQZQZEzVS8ZzCtaoVt13O7+0BUw8XNPJWMK8=; b=R9EoK0fa9Z++JThkR5FKP1qYU/9TIgD3WeTrbgZFENW7JFTScXN/gLqD9Rv/AwIzKJ KUykzhblpZLE1bmkyp8UAYL5rwIghmE5Ql5df4hd389nsT6e13JxsySDzLto/UmqOjL0 Wk4RyMWs67rwheZnSxcr/c2b8NDQCH+fQOrgK0Iji/m8bFJcMYbiYhcGX6jMdt//6PKZ xhSe3iwCCF6mN7b68mXkFhrFd045gJhNcpohEYlAo2do6v+YYY/G61UL6ruqsbSH/AEC qUkdqIohw0iH+a4bXaLYW95RtIKbwWLrUm6XuQtu0SDUtrvPp9NC6VRo2PE5xP439i9X WAvw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ly03rVdFQZQZEzVS8ZzCtaoVt13O7+0BUw8XNPJWMK8=; b=rZDMyhGpm5E9efNNLz8HyR6Irk3y9ltxtoRkwytCcZF/bu+Qyt2yat7LpCcna2XQNe OIXtvCPumCGVoHB2zUl2xTROBLsX+zccpMImYvYmZC7CiO411EAIgxooPyNwUss72slY 7qFJLXmZMRRNQyPrwjvqvbgZhmrCa1yXpqI+qV4pVYcxIqYaNCeFG3eWQxAsIjR/CawP EEtzpJESC++WpTQxzehPM2r0L+d95LVv6qvnEpirYqXqQgijHwummDqC7YK7a9rI+6aD J+EmHgzLlNIOYTUQq2TlFpxPA0fJ6iwkeDKPTAfLlHy8MhYNMm7fLPSxHGu8rx+GyWdy ZDAw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532WeoD9h57XqEbboq0ctqS2iF9cNnkgi+BzgHhz1lfu2wonPX/Z 8jnrcLRzhKnqHSC2/y/zTkcUdhMPsRwXBESdmno= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx6HvqkKPk89a4sqbpGujQgm6H45OJwozxgw+lVqfKgYNdzjqzfMw1NP4lEXKSBrFeezzESieFNYIvIKLSWIB8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:15cc:: with SMTP id j12mr32125945otr.116.1594047585387; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 07:59:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200702175352.19223-1-TheSven73@gmail.com> <20200702175352.19223-3-TheSven73@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Sven Van Asbroeck Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 10:59:34 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] ARM: imx6plus: optionally enable internal routing of clk_enet_ref To: Fabio Estevam Cc: Andy Duan , Shawn Guo , Rob Herring , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , netdev , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , dl-linux-imx , "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" , linux-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:58 AM Sven Van Asbroeck wrote: > > Hi Fabio, > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 9:46 AM Fabio Estevam wrote: > > > > Would it make sense to use compatible = "mmio-mux"; like we do on > > imx7s, imx6qdl.dtsi and imx8mq.dtsi? > > Maybe "fixed-mmio-clock" is a better candidate ? Actually no, the mmio memory there only controls the frequency... I don't think the clock framework has a ready-made abstraction suitable for a GPR clock mux yet?