From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF91C4742C for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 21:32:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E752224D for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 21:32:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="B4iMnoyb" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726570AbgKMVcD (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2020 16:32:03 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41304 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726491AbgKMVbx (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2020 16:31:53 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F220AC061A52; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:25:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com with SMTP id e5so5387688qvs.1; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:25:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TdnY99F9lb58bh9jAVmDJPNTy58Y1xlClOHjyC7GswE=; b=B4iMnoybje6QkXcPIbLnFFS42V9OzA72mbKDN83dmNEeTLxUupiQ0y8dtCzQWSHPZG Fu0ymwYgbpAcGsucftoHzqo/8Tl2WHxEdpnEQxMDN8xAAPdNj9YkoVUds6y1r+y/fnJC o9V/k3Q7bne0+B4AxJIYDTf/ZnVTPL0QEMpnqBG0/hYFAKncAU5ZKEPuk1pbp3et2P0q 5B7lQi/KRMYOTjhUIKe7M5BDCvjEvEmf13H/J0e+bWP8iurJhrxSVrYuA3qHvn2ulcBw 3wiZ9ie6E+CLOYArXylG5MIcedWf2DfUYSt6HR3YMZMffo5GUnj7mPjzAO1J45adamiR ipFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TdnY99F9lb58bh9jAVmDJPNTy58Y1xlClOHjyC7GswE=; b=RKNd6bXQaY4bYTiKGrFXixEXQp1+45HUz48MlFaIVSMHyCBNx1OlGng3bKO46JGPyU UNwfYQ20sKv6XV8hAXIKu88i2lqET0lY4qR2571lf+05zJYRdDCAtYFWvLz2WAmkVT/Q Ku4Rkh4whp8z+fNnOOyw0JHqP0rdZjh9H4Hc8p0hoyg0gptDoWlm+mMMK27m66HQugDl Ly+aYip4Ug9fzDu0YYuF1uhydnOlTC/dg+N9f+6HWm7hgiXFn2loJTQDGxuAgkCrYkIN UI5uimUjD7lmNicTejUIBdhjxGEWaUNIGInSX312BbnX9DORJZ7TXpHZUzxeDZ1fLr8P vG+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530sY3Cma03UIOHX0L8cpR/TD/yk0RGN+GC4cF1hTm3AhO6auZ+v bHwsInL1HYaXn4CqP6TnHVwKGFg3t1welnz5/7Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzETwy8FEM80LqNE0/UHC+bwYQaVFvbbEcw0buakJj3ZrQ2MS9AUs7lc/Y95OoEEQ8jmqm6L3+kLweAOH732ME= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:9021:: with SMTP id o30mr4318564qvo.1.1605302742125; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:25:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <44c8b5ae-3630-9d98-1ab4-5f57bfe0886c@gmail.com> <20201113085804.115806-1-lev@openvpn.net> <53474f83c4185caf2e7237f023cf0456afcc55cc.camel@sipsolutions.net> <20201113115118.618f57de@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> In-Reply-To: <20201113115118.618f57de@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> From: Lev Stipakov Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 23:25:31 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] net: mac80211: use core API for updating TX/RX stats To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Johannes Berg , "David S. Miller" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Heiner Kallweit , Lev Stipakov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Lev, please either post the patches separately (non-series) or make > them a proper series which has a cover letter etc. and CC folks on all > the patches. Understood, thanks. > Since there are no dependencies between the patches here you could have > gone for separate patches here. Shall I re-send those 3 patches separately or can we proceed with those in the (sub-optimal) form they've been already sent? -- -Lev