From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Oren Laadan <orenl@cellrox.com>,
Ruchi Kandoi <kandoiruchi@google.com>,
Rom Lemarchand <romlem@android.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>,
Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>, Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com>,
Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@google.com>,
Elliott Hughes <enh@google.com>, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] proc: Add LSM hook checks to /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:21:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhR8FUsPjt8KgW8Ub9Z5E4yXGesJ9314Z5hjH_QtR3kORw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469132667-17377-2-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org>
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 4:24 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:
> As requested, this patch checks the existing LSM hooks
> task_getscheduler/task_setscheduler when reading or modifying
> the task's timerslack value.
>
> Previous versions added new get/settimerslack LSM hooks, but
> since they checked the same PROCESS__SET/GETSCHED values as
> existing hooks, it was suggested we just use the existing ones.
>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> CC: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Oren Laadan <orenl@cellrox.com>
> Cc: Ruchi Kandoi <kandoiruchi@google.com>
> Cc: Rom Lemarchand <romlem@android.com>
> Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
> Cc: Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com>
> Cc: Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@google.com>
> Cc: Elliott Hughes <enh@google.com>
> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
> Cc: Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>
> Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> ---
> v2:
> * Initial swing at adding settimerslack LSM hook
> v3:
> * Fix current/p switchup bug noted by NickK
> * Add gettimerslack hook suggested by NickK
> v4:
> * Dropped adding get/settimerslack LSM hooks, and
> just reuse the get/setscheduler ones.
>
> fs/proc/base.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
For some reason I'm having a hard time finding patch 1/2 in the
patchset, but this patch looks reasonable to me. We already have some
LSM checking via the ptrace_may_access() call, but this adds some
additional granularity which could be a good thing.
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index c94abae..02f8389 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -2286,6 +2286,12 @@ static ssize_t timerslack_ns_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> goto out;
> }
>
> + err = security_task_setscheduler(p);
> + if (err) {
> + count = err;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> task_lock(p);
> if (slack_ns == 0)
> p->timer_slack_ns = p->default_timer_slack_ns;
> @@ -2314,6 +2320,10 @@ static int timerslack_ns_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> goto out;
> }
>
> + err = security_task_getscheduler(p);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> +
> task_lock(p);
> seq_printf(m, "%llu\n", p->timer_slack_ns);
> task_unlock(p);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-17 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-21 20:24 [PATCH 1/2 v4] proc: Relax /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns capability requirements John Stultz
2016-07-21 20:24 ` [PATCH 2/2 v4] proc: Add LSM hook checks to /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns John Stultz
2016-08-17 21:21 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2016-08-17 21:36 ` John Stultz
2016-08-02 0:18 ` [PATCH 1/2 v4] proc: Relax /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns capability requirements John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHC9VhR8FUsPjt8KgW8Ub9Z5E4yXGesJ9314Z5hjH_QtR3kORw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=dimitrysh@google.com \
--cc=enh@google.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kandoiruchi@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nnk@google.com \
--cc=orenl@cellrox.com \
--cc=romlem@android.com \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).