linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
	Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@bytedance.com>,
	io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] audit, io_uring, io-wq: Fix memory leak in io_sq_thread() and io_wqe_worker()
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 09:51:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhSjA444kYPEsBwWz3fuvY7ohmYb-HKWej4EmBy4mbS4Fw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220803222343.31673-1-yepeilin.cs@gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 6:24 PM Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@bytedance.com>
>
> Currently @audit_context is allocated twice for io_uring workers:
>
>   1. copy_process() calls audit_alloc();
>   2. io_sq_thread() or io_wqe_worker() calls audit_alloc_kernel() (which
>      is effectively audit_alloc()) and overwrites @audit_context,
>      causing:
>
>   BUG: memory leak
>   unreferenced object 0xffff888144547400 (size 1024):
> <...>
>     hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>       00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
>       00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
>     backtrace:
>       [<ffffffff8135cfc3>] audit_alloc+0x133/0x210
>       [<ffffffff81239e63>] copy_process+0xcd3/0x2340
>       [<ffffffff8123b5f3>] create_io_thread+0x63/0x90
>       [<ffffffff81686604>] create_io_worker+0xb4/0x230
>       [<ffffffff81686f68>] io_wqe_enqueue+0x248/0x3b0
>       [<ffffffff8167663a>] io_queue_iowq+0xba/0x200
>       [<ffffffff816768b3>] io_queue_async+0x113/0x180
>       [<ffffffff816840df>] io_req_task_submit+0x18f/0x1a0
>       [<ffffffff816841cd>] io_apoll_task_func+0xdd/0x120
>       [<ffffffff8167d49f>] tctx_task_work+0x11f/0x570
>       [<ffffffff81272c4e>] task_work_run+0x7e/0xc0
>       [<ffffffff8125a688>] get_signal+0xc18/0xf10
>       [<ffffffff8111645b>] arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x2b/0x730
>       [<ffffffff812ea44e>] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x5e/0x180
>       [<ffffffff844ae1b2>] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x12/0x20
>       [<ffffffff844a7e80>] do_syscall_64+0x40/0x80
>
> Then,
>
>   3. io_sq_thread() or io_wqe_worker() frees @audit_context using
>      audit_free();
>   4. do_exit() eventually calls audit_free() again, which is okay
>      because audit_free() does a NULL check.
>
> As suggested by Paul Moore, fix it by deleting audit_alloc_kernel() and
> redundant audit_free() calls.
>
> Fixes: 5bd2182d58e9 ("audit,io_uring,io-wq: add some basic audit support to io_uring")
> Suggested-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@bytedance.com>
> ---
> Change since v1:
>   - Delete audit_alloc_kernel() (Paul Moore)
>
>  fs/io-wq.c            |  3 ---
>  fs/io_uring.c         |  4 ----
>  include/linux/audit.h |  5 -----
>  kernel/auditsc.c      | 25 -------------------------
>  4 files changed, 37 deletions(-)

This looks good to me, thanks!  Although it looks like the io_uring
related changes will need to be applied by hand as they are pointing
to the old layout under fs/ as opposed to the newer layout in
io_uring/ introduced during this merge window.

Jens, did you want to take this via the io_uring tree or should I take
it via the audit tree?  If the latter, an ACK would be appreciated, if
the former my ACK is below.

Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

-- 
paul-moore.com

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-04 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-03  5:02 [PATCH] audit, io_uring, io-wq: Fix memory leak in io_sq_thread() and io_wqe_worker() Peilin Ye
2022-08-03 13:16 ` Paul Moore
2022-08-03 19:28   ` Paul Moore
2022-08-03 19:39     ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-03 20:24     ` Peilin Ye
2022-08-03 22:23 ` [PATCH v2] " Peilin Ye
2022-08-04 13:51   ` Paul Moore [this message]
2022-08-04 14:32     ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-04 14:44       ` Paul Moore
2022-08-04 14:36   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHC9VhSjA444kYPEsBwWz3fuvY7ohmYb-HKWej4EmBy4mbS4Fw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peilin.ye@bytedance.com \
    --cc=yepeilin.cs@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).