From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932651AbeCLPsC (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:48:02 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]:41959 "EHLO mail-lf0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932566AbeCLPsA (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:48:00 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELs5nJrZ6bzOik7mVChk75ve3zPFwbaXyQB9laxawhIpu82+4BN55tfYeyM99ZU2cD00eVqzU/FrOd0zh37sQpo= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [108.20.156.165] In-Reply-To: <20180312075938.7uo7vhzdyzhtzsph@madcap2.tricolour.ca> References: <1c5184985e422774329484153b0147c2861e91a7.1518603831.git.rgb@redhat.com> <20180312075938.7uo7vhzdyzhtzsph@madcap2.tricolour.ca> From: Paul Moore Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:47:58 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH ghak21 4/4] audit: add parent of refused symlink to audit_names To: Richard Guy Briggs Cc: Linux-Audit Mailing List , LKML , Eric Paris , Steve Grubb , Kees Cook Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 3:59 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 2018-03-08 19:50, Paul Moore wrote: ... >> (Point #2 is why I didn't merge patch 3/4, just include it in this >> revised patch) > > On reviewing this, I'm not totally convinced the parent record is > necessary to fully understand what happenned since there is a CWD > record. I left 3 and 4 as seperate patches in case it is found that > only 3 is necessary. You need to figure this out and decide what is necessary. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com