From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771F7C433E0 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 19:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D2723AA3 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 19:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728817AbhAHTR7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2021 14:17:59 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43354 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727376AbhAHTR7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2021 14:17:59 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-xd33.google.com (mail-io1-xd33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d33]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94280C061380; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:17:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io1-xd33.google.com with SMTP id e22so10271815iom.5; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:17:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/iMSKDwUK0Dhamj+iFw+n77dmHZP0my5gPs6n21NXXw=; b=QAOTNm+QNcWgL47iLbsNQcCbXMw04+sIkmxb8PBK9KdIuVTjoR1Nf3KalWTFrZ7K/u enhQu/B9N3y+bweGcneh1i7QelevIReuKhypW6+AS18xdIwmRuRFZ3+IN0FDPyq31xIy iglMCWdfbUn25Bhk+ueUQlJOoCBd9W6hRut+HD2TAMtyN17eKnQXzTyDAYtdL9NUyk8P cnXnU+afo5r1S3LcPCmNDj97cUZa76vwrF8PfihhTahrtFIVeUPN/lK5c+GuFEjbT8Nc jHgB/djlcS9r63tSBGtjjLzLDJfCsi3/LcbCjqQxZyCmnT0/qDx2zrmtTZ6nvuHf8dX0 dwBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/iMSKDwUK0Dhamj+iFw+n77dmHZP0my5gPs6n21NXXw=; b=jcdhGsNXhveeyzBVkZR4lyDbcH3OJgcIcmw/cCa92uNOouIFBY/3AFEYiG8KPJSFjV MBs5rT7kHUISQ14AhMARBdJYk2UGSyLumqG9EzNDEy2S9hlvjnwZgkAToDCJ079te/6y f9B3TDah/RW+b5hcYeZoJqd9X6QM2s4HD1xor41PBmaosdieO7/9TaDUjMTqcWo184Be FdbJQz7tJWbzIlCzvtt3jhuhWE9hJIiOWJvuRZTSnzIu8nGMHymCvO1F8RZJw/+gZasi Qnxq6XtewHXkiU48vDysAZg6+OvuXeadTdY4FbwAjcmrJOxcsPl7/UOcYy+GWT8Vobwd yD1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533SivfFK+l8n0EoIFrVmQFH8FIcnSQ7wOJ87/R86pkWPFoKWPGl 4D7k2BDcLUuPT5VQRUOpkvLUZ1UEAxuTrz3gPzaiQhXCm8VuGj75 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyL//rapegAYYhoC2sePJlVysU1h+1n4CrjEzqqdsUMg12wG6nrsmJP77X0+iWg10DwukjzgI9jkLvriZFGV98= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:153:: with SMTP id y19mr4668821jao.47.1610133437955; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:17:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201204095539.31705-1-andreas@kemnade.info> <20201204171428.0a011188@aktux> <20201207135753.GA26857@atomide.com> In-Reply-To: <20201207135753.GA26857@atomide.com> From: Adam Ford Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 13:17:06 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: fix idling of devices during probe To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Doug Anderson , Andreas Kemnade , Ulf Hansson , Wolfram Sang , linux-omap , Linux ARM , LKML , Discussions about the Letux Kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:01 AM Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Doug Anderson [201204 16:43]: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:14 AM Andreas Kemnade wrote: > > > > > > > > Fixes: 21b2cec61c04 ("mmc: Set PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS for drivers that existed in v4.4") > > > > > > > > From the description it sounds like this problem has always existed > > > > but the async probe just tickled it reliably. Seems like it'd make > > > > sense to tag the "Fixes" as some earlier commit so you make sure your > > > > fix gets picked to kernels even if they don't have the async probe > > > > patch? > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, maybe > > > Fixes: 04abaf07f6d5 ("ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: Sync omap_device and > > > pm_runtime after probe defer") > > > > > > But on the other hand to stable branches only such patches are applied > > > which solve pratical problems not only theoretical problems. But maybe > > > it solves several random issues where nobody took care to debug them. > > > > > > That would be since v4.11. > > > > I guess maybe best is to include both. Then if someone is debugging > > why their async probe is failing they will notice this commit, but > > they also might decide to pick it earlier just to be safe... > > OK I'll add the above fixes tag too and apply this into fixes. > It might be too late, but... Tested-by: Adam Ford #logicpd-torpedo-37xx-devkit > Thanks, > > Tony