linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@verdurent.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>,
	"maintainer:BROADCOM STB AVS TMON DRIVER" 
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"open list:BROADCOM STB AVS TMON DRIVER"
	<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] thermal: brcmstb_thermal: Do not use DT coefficients
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:11:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHLCerP6ricempeG=x-a2_aA6__YqADPKAEG5y7qPYNcD2=47Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191030182132.25763-2-f.fainelli@gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:51 PM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> At the time the brcmstb_thermal driver and its binding were merged, the
> DT binding did not make the coefficients properties a mandatory one,
> therefore all users of the brcmstb_thermal driver out there have a non
> functional implementation with zero coefficients. Even if these
> properties were provided, the formula used for computation is incorrect.
>
> The coefficients are entirely process specific (right now, only 28nm is
> supported) and not board or SoC specific, it is therefore appropriate to
> hard code them in the driver given the compatibility string we are
> probed with which has to be updated whenever a new process is
> introduced.
>
> We remove the existing coefficients definition since subsequent patches
> are going to add support for a new process and will introduce new
> coefficients as well.
>
> Fixes: 9e03cf1b2dd5 ("thermal: add brcmstb AVS TMON driver")

I think you should fix the computation formula as the first patch and
then merge the rest of this patch into your second patch.

I don't think the intermediate state of converting named constants to
magic numbers is needed just to convert it over to another set of
parameters.

Regards,
Amit

> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/broadcom/brcmstb_thermal.c | 37 ++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/broadcom/brcmstb_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/broadcom/brcmstb_thermal.c
> index 5825ac581f56..42482af0422e 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/broadcom/brcmstb_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/broadcom/brcmstb_thermal.c
> @@ -48,15 +48,6 @@
>  #define AVS_TMON_TEMP_INT_CODE         0x1c
>  #define AVS_TMON_TP_TEST_ENABLE                0x20
>
> -/* Default coefficients */
> -#define AVS_TMON_TEMP_SLOPE            -487
> -#define AVS_TMON_TEMP_OFFSET           410040
> -
> -/* HW related temperature constants */
> -#define AVS_TMON_TEMP_MAX              0x3ff
> -#define AVS_TMON_TEMP_MIN              -88161
> -#define AVS_TMON_TEMP_MASK             AVS_TMON_TEMP_MAX
> -
>  enum avs_tmon_trip_type {
>         TMON_TRIP_TYPE_LOW = 0,
>         TMON_TRIP_TYPE_HIGH,
> @@ -108,23 +99,11 @@ struct brcmstb_thermal_priv {
>         struct thermal_zone_device *thermal;
>  };
>
> -static void avs_tmon_get_coeffs(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *slope,
> -                               int *offset)
> -{
> -       *slope = thermal_zone_get_slope(tz);
> -       *offset = thermal_zone_get_offset(tz);
> -}
> -
>  /* Convert a HW code to a temperature reading (millidegree celsius) */
>  static inline int avs_tmon_code_to_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
>                                         u32 code)
>  {
> -       const int val = code & AVS_TMON_TEMP_MASK;
> -       int slope, offset;
> -
> -       avs_tmon_get_coeffs(tz, &slope, &offset);
> -
> -       return slope * val + offset;
> +       return (410040 - (int)((code & 0x3FF) * 487));
>  }
>
>  /*
> @@ -136,20 +115,16 @@ static inline int avs_tmon_code_to_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
>  static inline u32 avs_tmon_temp_to_code(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
>                                         int temp, bool low)
>  {
> -       int slope, offset;
> -
> -       if (temp < AVS_TMON_TEMP_MIN)
> -               return AVS_TMON_TEMP_MAX; /* Maximum code value */
> -
> -       avs_tmon_get_coeffs(tz, &slope, &offset);
> +       if (temp < -88161)
> +               return 0x3FF;   /* Maximum code value */
>
> -       if (temp >= offset)
> +       if (temp >= 410040)
>                 return 0;       /* Minimum code value */
>
>         if (low)
> -               return (u32)(DIV_ROUND_UP(offset - temp, abs(slope)));
> +               return (u32)(DIV_ROUND_UP(410040 - temp, 487));
>         else
> -               return (u32)((offset - temp) / abs(slope));
> +               return (u32)((410040 - temp) / 487);
>  }
>
>  static int brcmstb_get_temp(void *data, int *temp)
> --
> 2.17.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-04  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-30 18:21 [PATCH 0/6] brcmstb_thermal updates for new processes Florian Fainelli
2019-10-30 18:21 ` [PATCH 1/6] thermal: brcmstb_thermal: Do not use DT coefficients Florian Fainelli
2019-12-04  8:41   ` Amit Kucheria [this message]
2019-12-04 17:41     ` Florian Fainelli
2019-12-04 19:01       ` Amit Kucheria
2019-10-30 18:21 ` [PATCH 2/6] thermal: brcmstb_thermal: Prepare to support a different process Florian Fainelli
2019-10-30 18:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] dt-bindings: thermal: Define BCM7216 thermal sensor compatible Florian Fainelli
2019-11-06  3:55   ` Rob Herring
2019-10-30 18:21 ` [PATCH 4/6] thermal: brcmstb_thermal: Add 16nm process thermal parameters Florian Fainelli
2019-12-04  8:43   ` Amit Kucheria
2019-10-30 18:21 ` [PATCH 5/6] thermal: brcmstb_thermal: Restructure interrupt registration Florian Fainelli
2019-12-04  9:38   ` Amit Kucheria
2019-10-30 18:21 ` [PATCH 6/6] thermal: brcmstb_thermal: Register different ops per process Florian Fainelli
2019-12-04  9:38   ` Amit Kucheria
2019-11-20 18:43 ` [PATCH 0/6] brcmstb_thermal updates for new processes Florian Fainelli
2019-12-04  4:50   ` Florian Fainelli
2019-12-09  9:04     ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-12-09 17:36       ` Florian Fainelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHLCerP6ricempeG=x-a2_aA6__YqADPKAEG5y7qPYNcD2=47Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=amit.kucheria@verdurent.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mmayer@broadcom.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).