Marc, can you please test these 3 patches on top of my original series?

Andy, patches 1 and 2 fix problems that already exist upstream. They
were not introduced by my series.
Patch 3 fixes an issue with my series where the name of the thermal
zone was too long. You can choose to fold it into the patch titled
"arm64: dts: msm8998: thermal: Add temperature sensors near major
peripherals" or add it as a new patch with a Fixes tag.

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 8:00 PM Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr> wrote:
>
> On 23/04/2019 15:10, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>
> > Sure. I can give you a Tested-by once everything works on the MEDIABOX I have.
> >
> > You mention the 4 thermal_zone*/temp failures.
> >
> > What about the cluster0-mhm-thermal and cluster1-mhm-thermal failures?
>
> I have synced up with today's linux-next.

Thanks for the report. Can you add the attached couple of patches and retest?

> # dmesg | grep thermal
> Failed to build cluster0-mhm-thermal zone -22
> Failed to build cluster1-mhm-thermal zone -22

This one turned out to be a silly one, The name of the thermal zone is
restricted to under 20 characters. Fixed that with patch 3.

> # for F in $(find /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone?/ /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone??/ -type f); do echo $F; cat $F; done
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/uevent
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/trip_point_0_hyst
> 2000
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/mode
> enabled
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/power/runtime_active_time
> 0
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/power/runtime_status
> unsupported

<snip>

> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone8/type
> gpu-thermal-bottom
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone8/offset
> 0
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone8/slope
> 1
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone8/trip_point_0_type
> hot
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone8/k_po
> 0
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone8/integral_cutoff
> 0
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone8/k_i
> 0
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone8/k_pu
> 0
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone8/temp
> cat: read error: Invalid argument

Patch 2 should fix this and thermal_zone9 below.

> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone8/trip_point_0_temp
> 90000
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone9/uevent
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone9/trip_point_0_hyst
> 2000
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone9/passive
> 0
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone9/mode
> disabled
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone9/power/runtime_active_time
> 0
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone9/power/runtime_status
> unsupported
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone9/power/autosuspend_delay_ms
> cat: read error: Input/output error
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone9/power/runtime_suspended_time
> 0
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone9/power/control
> auto
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone9/available_policies
> step_wise
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone9/policy
> step_wise
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone9/k_d
> 0
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone9/sustainable_power
> 0
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone9/type
> gpu-thermal-top
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone9/offset
> 0
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone9/slope

<snip>

> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone18/available_policies
> step_wise
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone18/policy
> step_wise
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone18/k_d
> 0
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone18/sustainable_power
> 0
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone18/type
> battery-thermal

This look wrong. TSENS shouldn't have board-specific thermal zones.

<snip>

> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone19/k_d
> 0
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone19/sustainable_power
> 0
> /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone19/type
> skin-thermal

And this too. See patch 1 to fix this existing issue (not introduced
by my series).