linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@broadcom.com>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vikram Prakash <vikram.prakash@broadcom.com>,
	Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC, v1 0/3] msi support for platform devices
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 22:54:47 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHLZf_uAp-CzA-rkvFF70wT5zoB98OvErXxFthoBHyvzwTRxAQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96436cba-88e3-ddb6-36d6-000929b86979@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4041 bytes --]

Hi Eric,

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:10 AM Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Vikas,
>
> On 11/12/20 6:58 PM, Vikas Gupta wrote:
> > This RFC adds support for MSI for platform devices.
> > a) MSI(s) is/are added in addition to the normal interrupts.
> > b) The vendor specific MSI configuration can be done using
> >    callbacks which is implemented as msi module.
> > c) Adds a msi handling module for the Broadcom platform devices.
> >
> > Changes from:
> > -------------
> >  v0 to v1:
> >    i)  Removed MSI device flag VFIO_DEVICE_FLAGS_MSI.
> >    ii) Add MSI(s) at the end of the irq list of platform IRQs.
> >        MSI(s) with first entry of MSI block has count and flag
> >        information.
> >        IRQ list: Allocation for IRQs + MSIs are allocated as below
> >        Example: if there are 'n' IRQs and 'k' MSIs
> >        -------------------------------------------------------
> >        |IRQ-0|IRQ-1|....|IRQ-n|MSI-0|MSI-1|MSI-2|......|MSI-k|
> >        -------------------------------------------------------
> I have not taken time yet to look at your series, but to me you should have
> |IRQ-0|IRQ-1|....|IRQ-n|MSI|MSIX
> then for setting a given MSIX (i) you would select the MSIx index and
> then set start=i count=1.

As per your suggestion, we should have, if there are n-IRQs, k-MSIXs
and m-MSIs, allocation of IRQs should be done as below

|IRQ0|IRQ1|......|IRQ-(n-1)|MSI|MSIX|
                                             |        |
                                             |
|MSIX0||MSIX1||MSXI2|....|MSIX-(k-1)|
                                             |MSI0||MSI1||MSI2|....|MSI-(m-1)|
With this implementation user space can know that, at indexes n and
n+1, edge triggered interrupts are present.
   We may add an element in vfio_platform_irq itself to allocate MSIs/MSIXs
   struct vfio_platform_irq{
   .....
   .....
   struct vfio_platform_irq *block; => this points to the block
allocation for MSIs/MSIXs and all msi/msix are type of IRQs.
   };
                         OR
Another structure can be defined in 'vfio_pci_private.h'
struct vfio_msi_ctx {
        struct eventfd_ctx      *trigger;
        char                    *name;
};
and
struct vfio_platform_irq {
  .....
  .....
  struct vfio_msi_ctx *block; => this points to the block allocation
for MSIs/MSIXs
};
Which of the above two options sounds OK to you? Please suggest.

> to me individual MSIs are encoded in the subindex and not in the index.
> The index just selects the "type" of interrupt.
>
> For PCI you just have:
>         VFIO_PCI_INTX_IRQ_INDEX,
>         VFIO_PCI_MSI_IRQ_INDEX, -> MSI index and then you play with
> start/count
>         VFIO_PCI_MSIX_IRQ_INDEX,
>         VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX,
>         VFIO_PCI_REQ_IRQ_INDEX,
>
> (include/uapi/linux/vfio.h)

In pci case, type of interrupts is fixed so they can be 'indexed' by
these enums but for VFIO platform user space will need to iterate all
(num_irqs) indexes to know at which indexes edge triggered interrupts
are present.

Thanks,
Vikas
>
> Thanks
>
> Eric
> >        MSI-0 will have count=k set and flags set accordingly.
> >
> > Vikas Gupta (3):
> >   vfio/platform: add support for msi
> >   vfio/platform: change cleanup order
> >   vfio/platform: add Broadcom msi module
> >
> >  drivers/vfio/platform/Kconfig                 |   1 +
> >  drivers/vfio/platform/Makefile                |   1 +
> >  drivers/vfio/platform/msi/Kconfig             |   9 +
> >  drivers/vfio/platform/msi/Makefile            |   2 +
> >  .../vfio/platform/msi/vfio_platform_bcmplt.c  |  74 ++++++
> >  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c  |  86 ++++++-
> >  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c     | 238 +++++++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h |  23 ++
> >  8 files changed, 419 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/platform/msi/Kconfig
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/platform/msi/Makefile
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/platform/msi/vfio_platform_bcmplt.c
> >
>

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4163 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-13 17:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-05  6:02 [RFC, v0 0/3] msi support for platform devices Vikas Gupta
2020-11-05  6:02 ` [RFC, v0 1/3] vfio/platform: add support for msi Vikas Gupta
2020-11-05  7:08   ` Alex Williamson
2020-11-06  2:54     ` Vikas Gupta
2020-11-06  3:12       ` Alex Williamson
2020-11-09  6:41         ` Vikas Gupta
2020-11-09 15:18           ` Auger Eric
2020-11-09 15:28           ` Alex Williamson
2020-11-10 11:06             ` Vikas Gupta
2020-11-09 15:05       ` Auger Eric
2020-11-10 11:01         ` Vikas Gupta
2020-11-05  6:02 ` [RFC, v0 2/3] vfio/platform: change cleanup order Vikas Gupta
2020-11-05  6:02 ` [RFC, v0 3/3] vfio/platform: add Broadcom msi module Vikas Gupta
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC, v1 0/3] msi support for platform devices Vikas Gupta
2020-11-12 17:58   ` [RFC v1 1/3] vfio/platform: add support for msi Vikas Gupta
2020-11-12 17:58   ` [RFC v1 2/3] vfio/platform: change cleanup order Vikas Gupta
2020-11-12 17:58   ` [RFC v1 3/3] vfio/platform: add Broadcom msi module Vikas Gupta
2020-11-12 18:40   ` [RFC, v1 0/3] msi support for platform devices Auger Eric
2020-11-13 17:24     ` Vikas Gupta [this message]
2020-11-16 13:14       ` Auger Eric
2020-11-17  6:25         ` Vikas Gupta
2020-11-17  8:05           ` Auger Eric
2020-11-17  8:25             ` Auger Eric
2020-11-17 16:36               ` Vikas Gupta
2020-11-18 11:00                 ` Auger Eric
2020-11-24 16:16   ` [RFC, v2 0/1] " Vikas Gupta
2020-11-24 16:16     ` [RFC v2 1/1] vfio/platform: add support for msi Vikas Gupta
2020-12-02 14:44       ` Auger Eric
2020-12-03 14:50         ` Vikas Gupta
2020-12-07 20:43           ` Auger Eric
2020-12-10  7:34             ` Vikas Gupta
2020-12-11  8:40               ` Auger Eric
2020-12-02 14:43     ` [RFC, v2 0/1] msi support for platform devices Auger Eric
2020-12-03 14:39       ` Vikas Gupta
2020-12-14 17:45     ` [RFC, v3 0/2] " Vikas Gupta
2020-12-14 17:45       ` [RFC v3 1/2] vfio/platform: add support for msi Vikas Gupta
2020-12-22 17:27         ` Auger Eric
2021-01-05  5:53           ` Vikas Gupta
2021-01-12  9:00             ` Auger Eric
2021-01-15  6:26               ` Vikas Gupta
2021-01-15  9:25                 ` Auger Eric
2020-12-14 17:45       ` [RFC v3 2/2] vfio/platform: msi: add Broadcom platform devices Vikas Gupta
2021-01-12  9:22         ` Auger Eric
2021-01-15  6:35           ` Vikas Gupta
2021-01-15  9:24             ` Auger Eric
2021-01-19 22:45               ` Alex Williamson
2021-01-20 10:22                 ` Auger Eric
2021-01-29 17:24       ` [RFC v4 0/3] msi support for " Vikas Gupta
2021-01-29 17:24         ` [RFC v4 1/3] vfio/platform: add support for msi Vikas Gupta
2021-02-08 13:30           ` Auger Eric
2021-01-29 17:24         ` [RFC v4 2/3] vfio/platform: change cleanup order Vikas Gupta
2021-02-08 13:31           ` Auger Eric
2021-01-29 17:24         ` [RFC v4 3/3] vfio: platform: reset: add msi support Vikas Gupta
2021-02-08 15:27           ` Auger Eric

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHLZf_uAp-CzA-rkvFF70wT5zoB98OvErXxFthoBHyvzwTRxAQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=vikas.gupta@broadcom.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=srinath.mannam@broadcom.com \
    --cc=vikram.prakash@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).