From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C5B5C43381 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:59:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF20C21934 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="RroLO87p" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730298AbfBOA7S (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2019 19:59:18 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com ([209.85.128.68]:51925 "EHLO mail-wm1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726461AbfBOA7R (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2019 19:59:17 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id b11so8311435wmj.1; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 16:59:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uyivuSNS3T//EPBbYRrQNiWfYaC7QsAANNMOOd/BlNE=; b=RroLO87ps+DHsOWieR/cw9j6QcIu7KgHdnwbqby3Hk8A6RbcfrJmZwVgKb/FHjWwer 8fpHQ87kEf8OtNKwyQKFYgJMrbMFbhE4cJC60PuHehlC+8qrQidy+lOc8e4i/9IB0aSn SfRsu2QuND/YTFn6htfRRiBZn5tV5GroHBvArjXRcvkImgHxL7fkRrr9il/TbDQbv5i4 9TfhZAi6xrFHBh37eho7sAKs6w9Nmy89ikFQOjFAfzj7k2alhN1XV1jn7HTGLcgBHTTZ tNEKofi5zc71u03cM5XE5D5UrKIAtYQWNhVLjnzGju0eBUWolx0ebsvGZg8W9XUm+Ufv K7cg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uyivuSNS3T//EPBbYRrQNiWfYaC7QsAANNMOOd/BlNE=; b=O3IR9qGVSspwLpwokyG3F8E8ycjzUrYpV0S0fVjY6whAhvMbrQNNin+eFlkaN7YYib 7ncC42pv4nVrgGrBWs+kwUc5RzfO1HuLuTpWw02SM1U0CSzb+Y29g+ca7haHzSBDxOOn qAmrZdMJVDP6CQt3+BvGn43pldyTbYu5FFVv5s6WRJVuOmpdAiuJmTMdZt7B2naynBT6 yKsjeXhowIdn2AKw28baJj/br/J3OQPtynTmITxmjr2VjxI+vdFHR6JmfEo2u49/SY10 Mg1Mr2jfSjAs/PmkC0wxCesbohX8HZ7GejY3OxuFSOkCeCu1iQGBteui/A4PtFG4icGX gbhg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZdQBBTp7o/98gTxSrT1gdKnl0YR976femH2VXFRNd6X5273bxv gWBizzWHDpPK19rx7qEz9MnXxZNS6xv3F+fB/LM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYMrWs8hS6iDxd3ygyPPWsKldXVFK1KERDyMi6a+7yHvSzJLbOPh8cM/ufWJ9be5DEwlaPKvgawTY3tOjOFso4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:220b:: with SMTP id z11mr4382465wml.37.1550192355474; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 16:59:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190104174925.17153-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> <20190201162729.GA22030@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20190201162729.GA22030@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> From: Andrey Smirnov Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 16:59:04 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] i.MX6, DesignWare PCI improvements To: Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: Lucas Stach , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , Fabio Estevam , Chris Healy , Leonard Crestez , "A.s. Dong" , Richard Zhu , dl-linux-imx , linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 8:27 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 09:49:05AM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > > Everyone: > > > > This is the series containing various small improvements that I made > > while reading the code and researching commit history of pci-imx6.c > > and pcie-designware*.c files. All changes are optional, so commits > > that don't seem like an improvement can be easily dropped. Hopefully > > each patch is self-explanatory. > > Side note: You should trim the CC list, eg I do not think CC LKML is > needed at all for this series. > I add it because it's always recommended by scripts/get_maintainer.pl and it really simplifies creating lore references to previous versions of the patches I sent, that is I don't have to remember which tree-specific list that series went to. > @Lucas: May I ask you to consider please which patches you deem > worth for inclusion ? I will have a look too but I would be grateful > if the driver maintainers can chime in to help. > Lorenzo, can you apply the dwc specific patches that are already reviewed by Gustavo Pimentel from this series, to keep things moving while we are waiting on Lucas? I can also spin them out into a separate series if that's perferable. Thanks, Andrey Smirnov