From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A71C4332F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 18:43:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231872AbiKGSnf (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2022 13:43:35 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56016 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231995AbiKGSnb (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2022 13:43:31 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A2161103 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 10:43:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id 136so7362619pga.1 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 10:43:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/yoRrsDL4rjZUsiXxqy6NkYQLHd5ebMM1o8RAy5KU7k=; b=Esfsrl296DK0gl8bWsolF/ZyGX0HPlftAEWIoja/4VX/5Q6Kcx1dlwnI5YXcw55HQP RXXZ9jJcIW+a7KYCQyZ9OE8qexU2K0Rz/STr7a0eVefP+Uhg6arVNVzfK17vesBxIsZf 9xVhEy4I+4Gm4qroCe+CNKqgak+NCJAvddY8U= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=/yoRrsDL4rjZUsiXxqy6NkYQLHd5ebMM1o8RAy5KU7k=; b=7PedQwCey0HRDGkY5EzgjHDpwsCiOR/mw8P59szdhEccLrT4qs2TP9HetHM9fIA1T0 Lbgp4rjDuebou7hUlzW/ry10Pqaqx6Ja64EbljSkR0SACczwgSOMHMsW8TKie3e9rInT iaZlmFZSfDHdj4ogmiED3ECRoLKmZAEpsHRwbo71G0/78M+OZTXYEettDkGndcA9b+q5 H0X5HiQg4fqEsu9ehkD30RY/uYD1NGlQlw6WxUDehcLOae39Cbga/TJN9jo2mVDXtPbA K0EsLTCRLmzkjevnpBfGVoYfxGCSBewWIpbNOQdPYN/ehvx52Wj8nBlFEgMuWNIukDBz dK3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3C0UtiF99vAMFifYTxdoQb4tM8sSIpkxNysXB/0NE9amFSSa3x XrdGlGNl/wdxEBYKXZf5xLUuF94P+VmmFQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6yChQWYKpAtbO+7zeewKfoDFVnyGxrSjwIQdBDQSRkdNEgjBuzANqV1JdZxPpYLgulSyxraw== X-Received: by 2002:a65:5a8b:0:b0:470:2ecd:ea02 with SMTP id c11-20020a655a8b000000b004702ecdea02mr18896335pgt.83.1667846607613; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 10:43:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pf1-f176.google.com (mail-pf1-f176.google.com. [209.85.210.176]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ij22-20020a170902ab5600b0017f36638010sm5259437plb.276.2022.11.07.10.43.27 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Nov 2022 10:43:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-f176.google.com with SMTP id i3so11436098pfc.11 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 10:43:27 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8d17:0:b0:560:485a:e242 with SMTP id j23-20020aa78d17000000b00560485ae242mr51617419pfe.31.1667846178911; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 10:36:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220929161917.2348231-1-rrangel@chromium.org> <20220929093200.v6.6.I8092e417a8152475d13d8d638eb4c5d8ea12ac7b@changeid> In-Reply-To: From: Raul Rangel Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 11:36:07 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/13] ACPI: resources: Add wake_capable parameter to acpi_dev_irq_flags To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Andy Shevchenko , ACPI Devel Maling List , linux-input , Hans de Goede , Mika Westerberg , Mario Limonciello , Tim Van Patten , Linus Walleij , "jingle.wu" , Dan Williams , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jonathan Cameron , Len Brown , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Terry Bowman , Tom Rix , Linux Kernel Mailing List , llvm@lists.linux.dev, Alexis Savery Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 8:53 AM Raul Rangel wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 10:56 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 7:55 PM Dmitry Torokhov > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 08:42:13PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 07:13:37PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 1:22 AM Dmitry Torokhov > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > I think that patches [5-8/13] from this series are significant > > > > > framework changes, so it would make sense to route them via the ACPI > > > > > tree. > > > > > > > > > > If this is fine with everybody, I will queue them up for merging into > > > > > 6.1 (probably in the second half of the upcoming merge window). > > > > > > > > I believe it's fine from GPIO ACPI perspective (there shouldn't be conflict, > > > > but if you wish you always may take this PR [1] to your tree (it's already in > > > > GPIO tree pending v6.1), it may be considered as immutable tag. > > > > > > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/Yym%2Fj+Y9MBOIhWtK@black.fi.intel.com/ > > > > > > Yeah, having an immutable branch hanging off 6.0-rcN would be awesome - > > > I could pull it and this would avoid any potential conflicts later. > > > > This material is in the mainline now, but the branch is still there in > > case you need it: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \ > > acpi-wakeup > > > > It won't be necessary any more after 6.1-rc1 is out, though, I suppose. > > > Awesome, thanks for merging in the ACPI patches! Dmitry, What are the next steps to getting the I2C patches landed? Should I push out a new series that's rebased on 6.1-rc1?