From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35AD4C432C0 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A77B20740 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="Q5xNCOML" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729321AbfKYSNJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Nov 2019 13:13:09 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f67.google.com ([209.85.208.67]:34764 "EHLO mail-ed1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727832AbfKYSNI (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Nov 2019 13:13:08 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f67.google.com with SMTP id cx19so5892548edb.1 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:13:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jnxcpMz5dNB2R0ZiMjMQv7ajBq4qcecqf6LvupZ/sR0=; b=Q5xNCOMLxN73mwQWlR3JO4ib7P8cr1bXyAiG/WlEd5AM1cIX0+MgMBFMDnxf57Dl+9 +8ithnSkyAFcvXriItOzZRDpcOpCeHyNSUWY7er3QW32I8KsRGXkhf9LuRt1lNY7p5oI u5lw/tDvjbYLTSBvq/hexPE93yDkO6Yxz+39E= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jnxcpMz5dNB2R0ZiMjMQv7ajBq4qcecqf6LvupZ/sR0=; b=ng0SEIMSU7b4VjNJUyEa/UGk+ziNgMNgFVHqdb9HGkn8p0YnXhQitA0Jgryy7nDoqx 4enByk9gXOukiQqZ2zyXZqCu3Gm3OH4z12UC9uUzazQDEytiLQ2VX9bJeZQRBiaDOUGo dvjmp17GTWIv6ovG21g42STveKg5TEw8yTetp/I2miCnq64ystYjao0PYPwmNP9DkQtH lUn19z+4d+Km37wXowNCUp4JnfTWF3r6b5L/gxEqTsrz4IipUjNySqYcHeg4wTrh8DLm FKbKNBWnGGoOfzIUsBRZja1/UKFisEMmVe8FKqj7Q+hcfLxvR8wc/b04fEliBeUn0sTU 30vg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVkeJOpHKn+plXIhY047dlqBL1Nh11M527R4PT+os93/MTfKIJw 3n+B6sU6MKvSGTlT2OE6s6etfQK7buc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy+v1tAyLq1vrAdtcWgokGoHsz1jh216KYvf9pzSSXYV6p4PByjIFvGilQy+NQ/e2gq5B2ABQ== X-Received: by 2002:a50:b6f8:: with SMTP id f53mr20168710ede.29.1574705586760; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:13:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com (mail-wr1-f54.google.com. [209.85.221.54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b22sm257048edj.25.2019.11.25.10.13.04 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:13:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id s5so19314558wrw.2 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:13:04 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5224:: with SMTP id i4mr32943767wra.303.1574705584339; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:13:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191121211053.48861-1-rrangel@chromium.org> <20191121140830.2.I68b9a92ed4def031c3f247d3b49996a2512d762d@changeid> In-Reply-To: From: Raul Rangel Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:12:53 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] i2c: i2c-cros-ec-tunnel: Fix ACPI identifier To: Enric Balletbo i Serra Cc: Wolfram Sang , Akshu Agrawal , linux-kernel , Guenter Roeck , Benson Leung , Neil Armstrong , Dmitry Torokhov , "open list:I2C SUBSYSTEM HOST DRIVERS" , dlaurie@chromium.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 9:23 AM Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote: > > Hi Raul, > > On 21/11/19 22:10, Raul E Rangel wrote: > > The initial patch was using the incorrect identifier. > > > > Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel > > --- > > There are currently no boards using the identifier so it's fine to > > change it. > > > > Right, I don't see GOOG001A being used but also I don't see GOOG0012. Anyway, > for the CrOS EC side, the change looks good to me. I think this will go through > the I2C tree? > Is you were curious, here is the firmware patch: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/coreboot/+/1928674