From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A155C63777 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 07:15:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4993921D93 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 07:15:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="aLY3U6MT" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2392689AbgK0HPO (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2020 02:15:14 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50906 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726408AbgK0HPK (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2020 02:15:10 -0500 Received: from mail-oo1-xc43.google.com (mail-oo1-xc43.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81480C0613D1 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 23:15:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oo1-xc43.google.com with SMTP id r11so892054oos.12 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 23:15:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yaxtEmqvmorbGKJnkkOGAi0ROIbuHga/om0nivkkb44=; b=aLY3U6MTUL5dWJ51yx3EqCGeVIF57s3SnrwJbIRRWHH1wUjzpWGvhbxj7+9L8qkAU4 WFVkHwVupp1lxevjJtNOAMyDzwPNsxVnIhoXQOMIZYWO8T5OJGRf1Nxi5UA5etOWAGKW hjA1KC2oJmcYo1OpRvgw2V2Wl4C2Ry0l9nM/UUIeiILMD+n7GiLOh66BXBAZ+7+XtLp0 +YELbcmEOAQnnvL03qfBtucnfXw21h/kZXqyPQwbcbQMbet1TOfguLjVZtP5PopZT8H5 jES04bkn9ADkCO7hjLaAuCx8MLL7+e4r72MVV9aYBit52kFHYQx4lmUuy2yMvfk1VWyS zZKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yaxtEmqvmorbGKJnkkOGAi0ROIbuHga/om0nivkkb44=; b=mO3VzwQrp2gI+UBAteKNAbcTtx3vARRiMDz/Heg+98B84RYgcEobRvDdBJ5zq29Q8m 3/jYXZIYUsSRJ0f8IMV8KYTuylxOjhxI4nWEzkCbtaPn/HKh3IFmM2IxpHAR+eX41RAD dXBEVWn2qYEygL8vowiQkwV6CtSO47LvpKaJLnL+pYBlSSP35oIDGoQzEx5bnu+ePVLq zGTwe8m9gTnVH7hFw3X/oyJEeICqL+jwWaiwSw5xaNy94YRjMcmrnOFo4bnkTGEbnwcC lum1X3zFS1Hp1RHdaAvpCk8LXllyFKLQMSqHiozPreaHHcf2cORuvXl1K9GCyEvb4G2q EEEA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5310d68kDIkBn7dRkZZDZBB4H2/9gsdWNZJ71MuVQSViRya79yLu TBLtYD0ywrqoMsvn6Wzw+iwEzHdS11xyK3/aLLjtkQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzaQ7O+e2Jbc1bKrR0f+Mraefm0He/WricXD5DvEREyOW1QEFDqCYH+RUzETNr0QT8k5tlI+7JXq4ssDiMD0no= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:de87:: with SMTP id v7mr4592060oou.6.1606461309608; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 23:15:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201125120134.GA1642471@jade> In-Reply-To: From: Jens Wiklander Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:14:59 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] OP-TEE driver for v5.11 To: Arnd Bergmann List-Id: Cc: arm-soc , SoC Team , Linux Kernel Mailing List , op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org, Rui Miguel Silva Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnd, On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:00 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:01 PM Jens Wiklander > wrote: > > > > Hello arm-soc maintainers, > > > > Please pull this small patch which allows the OP-TEE driver to work with > > ARMv7 based single CPU systems. > > Can you rebase that branch onto -rc1? I had started the arm/drivers > branch early on top of that, so I'd prefer to avoid a backmerged. > > For the commit itself, shouldn't that be marked as a bugfix and get > merged into v5.10 instead? If it should, you don't have to rebase > since the arm/fixes branch is already ahead. Yes it is a bit of a bugfix, so if you don't mind taking it as that I'm sure that Rui would be happy to get it in this release. > > Also, it would be nice to Cc linux-arm-kernel on the pull request > in addition to linux-kernel. I'll keep that in mind the next time. Thanks for the feedback. Cheers, Jens