From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD61C43381 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95792081B for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="Emk0Jfs+" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726962AbfBUTJW (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:09:22 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-f180.google.com ([209.85.167.180]:46478 "EHLO mail-oi1-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726914AbfBUTJU (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:09:20 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-f180.google.com with SMTP id j135so2311278oib.13 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:09:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/rpg1D9lSXGVTvk03mqr3lk2+qeUKb8eMWwtK9VjlJA=; b=Emk0Jfs+KQ7OVgWqVg+QPBcv/P/G8aqUu1ytJUhYJ7kiaJkU84302UTfqAW4Gh/hxQ JRSFc2NioTNnVFSeMFi6oWn29KVhvmRKrC87Zmth/gXBsmB3Z6FGDU6T39EewzTipJ6h dlhcHofZm9TDPfHdNn8FN6MauSxG2iQvetKgE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/rpg1D9lSXGVTvk03mqr3lk2+qeUKb8eMWwtK9VjlJA=; b=eLHNtbH6fkVqp5vZbza7BRm4QsJBN/CKNayrymb13XkGALB7Q0gubJvsGVlWIYb3dI p/+QG1LGPMb7HLmTuvzFakosDrhWrSc6Cjdf8G3kFC24sSOwp22wwKKLB5AOmAsGF3SN Xnaj/z8TEhzKpDH+GExgVnaRNrnor348BdloNml5vfklbazl0ia8Sw777FhNCouC2wx6 HkcM/8qwZJej7ldzGLtdwUsQUV//uiiRJs19Vd4fqPMYk3e8hCTPtRSj7RnmtzkLS0c0 Yj0Bo2x1IZifLpI6JpyQDczpuVuJhgkPSihBpRxNSfmER61upE3xgHB5FVJB+ZmNzPod jfLg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuYJ/HZQHE0Shh01cgZj2cr0qWQEC6d4wMPRN0M4uC9OPlBI2F1G 507B7x00qwekcp78eiORRx1UA1J6dmI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYMgk4eSIbYXHC1c5dgJxz65E0QMBeq6O/t3LlIwr9XEPyon+WUKuJt/naXUTEYh3rzgdVQTA== X-Received: by 2002:aca:f0c3:: with SMTP id o186mr28217oih.101.1550776158945; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:09:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ot1-f45.google.com (mail-ot1-f45.google.com. [209.85.210.45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x127sm7797267oix.25.2019.02.21.11.09.17 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:09:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-f45.google.com with SMTP id n8so45871531otl.6 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:09:17 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:30d1:: with SMTP id r17mr23815otg.269.1550776157241; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:09:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190220215826.44366-1-ncrews@chromium.org> <20190221070704.GD1711@kadam> In-Reply-To: <20190221070704.GD1711@kadam> From: Nick Crews Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 12:09:06 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] platform/chrome: Fix off-by-one error in wilco_ec/debugfs.c To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra , Benson Leung , linux-kernel , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Duncan Laurie Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thanks Dan, noted. On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:31 AM Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 03:15:18PM -0700, Nick Crews wrote: > > Fixing something after it's already in the tree was a new > > process for me, so I tried to copy other people's examples. Please > > let me know if there's anything else I should do something different > > next time. > > I seldom mention how much I like Reported-by tags because it makes me > seem needy... Also in this case it doesn't matter because it's going to > get folded into the original patch so it's going to be lost anyway. But > since you're asking process questions, the Reported-by cookie is nice. > > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter > > regards, > dan carpenter >