From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02ACCC2BB48 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:29:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE94224F4 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:29:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729516AbgLOM3L (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:29:11 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51706 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729500AbgLOM2U (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:28:20 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-xd42.google.com (mail-io1-xd42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EF43C06179C; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 04:27:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io1-xd42.google.com with SMTP id w18so6412195iot.0; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 04:27:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bgzicqHGurBoYsOg6Ds+t2DBVqpKT7glXw7tbw5LPNI=; b=lnWZIpSBb4qC9GXdfGstcGgcx7Kgu6yKphmlx+1QASnzSdYQ9yxaLe7sM/5M9CoUUx kZx3oeQJ5ldF8hPHJzjH0zpHyIipRSMMttrZaO9ppxkDOb8SEhrkwMCqXl6QEMeE9cNG r+lA40IVspcDfyKsRpjVU8NEHHLiDDn4UJuYhptsJQPQPP1xGVwb/7JlAdiEFcbtv/qs mJJsoRCp9lXsZLaeKzHqGXYfk4KD/+iBhi8UkTjmd5Y59SN9tElAbTLl0qeOM1dIyxIQ Cjlk89JdfYQFecPraY1AUE5lrcLvdZjJfllVKF8YMCOT+QrM/JezGLG5JFGqGHNPGRLR FcNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bgzicqHGurBoYsOg6Ds+t2DBVqpKT7glXw7tbw5LPNI=; b=U5dRyEWTyoOKONtQhO+JeqhAZ4pCrMkEpffnn4Jes375cw2R6ob9xKH5JumG1hG3Gw NdxW5zI8wZY9WKQpIMLU3Gf8VOgzWWqdGFF965xMLqRwXIcrbI2NT2CzkmKU8GCodQq6 msMbjOC4fLSipqIZIyFJLzYbPCU+OzV2VAunvQJr2K2NB8eybkqsx7pGJnk8IEORB7Zz 9f4n5WAE9OFpiTfL4bpJjvbybvR4tHHsaNyqA23tLxBVR3IMKtmyvyFixMVpHe/vuZPj dJZpE2vN5RVkO4sd0gSqkuZ3WHtQu0AXD+Qbq8acfGOkIsXXauSy7lXT3LlaNniYNQer PDyA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5304uU9WxzRHXC4IIerdtnee+Chxdk6OpODWs/lsGicOJK9YCHTm V+6CcQEHByl79Q+0Fch6FpcywTV+QT1fyB5fFDY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxSz/+zoLLj7JVt9L136lIOdTmaPso2a5vLMkNJtcMA7k63WEeQlv+9ImJs5IFW2UgjTbT3okSQ7+l4behmusY= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:9512:: with SMTP id r18mr38525653ioj.86.1608035259607; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 04:27:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201212090234.0362d64f@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <20201214103008.14783-1-gomonovych@gmail.com> <20201214111608.GE5005@unreal> <20201214110351.29ae7abb@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <1113d2d634d46adb9384e09c3f70cb8376a815c4.camel@perches.com> <20201215051838.GH5005@unreal> <19198242da4d01804dc20cb41e870b05041bede2.camel@perches.com> <20201215061847.GL5005@unreal> In-Reply-To: <20201215061847.GL5005@unreal> From: Vasyl Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 13:27:28 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/mlx4: Use true,false for bool variable To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Joe Perches , Jakub Kicinski , tariqt@nvidia.com, "David S. Miller" , Netdev , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Ouuu it was fixed recently in net-next. Sorry, I missed that. Thanks for submitting policy clarification I am going to adapt to it. Thanks On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 7:18 AM Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 09:37:34PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 07:18 +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:15:01AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > I prefer revisions to single patches (as opposed to large patch ser= ies) > > > > in the same thread. > > > > > > It depends which side you are in that game. From the reviewer point o= f > > > view, such submission breaks flow very badly. It unfolds the already > > > reviewed thread, messes with the order and many more little annoying > > > things. > > > > This is where I disagree with you. I am a reviewer here. > > It is ok, different people have different views. > > > > > Not having context to be able to inspect vN -> vN+1 is made > > more difficult not having the original patch available and > > having to search history for it. > > I'm following after specific subsystems and see all patches there, > so for me and Jakub context already exists. > > Bottom line, it depends on the workflow. > > > > > Almost no one adds URL links to older submissions below the ---. > > Too bad, maybe it is time to enforce it. > > > > > Were that a standard mechanism below the --- line, then it would > > be OK. > > So let's me summarize, we (RDMA and netdev subsystems) would like to ask > do not submit new patch revisions as reply-to. > > Thanks --=20 =D0=94=D0=BE=D0=B1=D1=80=D0=BE=D1=97 =D0=B2=D0=B0=D0=BC =D0=BF=D0=BE=D1=80= =D0=B8 =D0=B4=D0=BD=D1=8F.