From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753559AbcFUCQe (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 20 Jun 2016 22:16:34 -0400
Received: from mail-vk0-f67.google.com ([209.85.213.67]:33964 "EHLO
	mail-vk0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751816AbcFUCQc (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 20 Jun 2016 22:16:32 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHb8M2CnYfqtRUAnx8C4TVUCtkYyQs7Fbr6wT1==kbTtqehjEw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160510064450.GA25522@certreview.com> <CAHb8M2CnYfqtRUAnx8C4TVUCtkYyQs7Fbr6wT1==kbTtqehjEw@mail.gmail.com>
From: DaeSeok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:15:50 +0900
Message-ID: <CAHb8M2CrPUN4q42-9Yfm9cunF2BSvkcv408+uzKmvDd-LA256w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] staging: dgnc: remove redundant NULL checks in
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Mark Hounschell <markh@compro.net>, Lidza Louina <lidza.louina@gmail.com>,
        "driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org" 
	<driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
        devel <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

2016-06-16 18:23 GMT+09:00 DaeSeok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>:
> 2016-05-10 15:44 GMT+09:00 Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>:
>> The dgnc_block_til_ready() is only used in dgnc_tty_open().
>> The unit data(struct un_t) was stored into tty->driver_data in dgnc_tty_open().
>> And also tty and un were tested about NULL so these variables doesn't
>> need to check for NULL in dgnc_block_til_ready().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>
>> ---
> Hello Greg,
>
> This patch and patches from this were not merged into your tree for a one month.
> Can you tell me why these are still waiting to merge?

Hello Greg,

Please have a look my comment. My patches have been waiting to merge
your staging tree for a month.
If you don't have pending patches from me, I can send those again.

Thanks.
regards,
Daeseok.
>
> Thanks.
> regards,
> Daeseok.
>
>
>> RESEND: more explanation about this patch.
>> origin patch : https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/4/12
>>
>>  drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_tty.c | 9 ++-------
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_tty.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_tty.c
>> index a505775..cff34d4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_tty.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_tty.c
>> @@ -1172,17 +1172,12 @@ static int dgnc_block_til_ready(struct tty_struct *tty,
>>                                 struct channel_t *ch)
>>  {
>>         int retval = 0;
>> -       struct un_t *un = NULL;
>> +       struct un_t *un = tty->driver_data;
>>         unsigned long flags;
>>         uint    old_flags = 0;
>>         int     sleep_on_un_flags = 0;
>>
>> -       if (!tty || tty->magic != TTY_MAGIC || !file || !ch ||
>> -           ch->magic != DGNC_CHANNEL_MAGIC)
>> -               return -ENXIO;
>> -
>> -       un = tty->driver_data;
>> -       if (!un || un->magic != DGNC_UNIT_MAGIC)
>> +       if (!file)
>>                 return -ENXIO;
>>
>>         spin_lock_irqsave(&ch->ch_lock, flags);
>> --
>> 2.8.2
>>