linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
	"open list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER" <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Vanya Lazeev <ivan.lazeev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] tpm: tpm_crb: enhance resource mapping mechanism for supporting AMD's fTPM
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 00:28:18 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHjaAcRf3fcJMp6AwVRTrVaABZVzSkhBwRcpKZogAS4SSDK3zg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190910150342.GA1920@linux.intel.com>

>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 03:42:15PM +0100, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 06:09:06PM +0900, Seunghun Han wrote:
> > > I got an AMD system which had a Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and MSI
> > > mainboard, and I had a problem with AMD's fTPM. My machine showed an error
> > > message below, and the fTPM didn't work because of it.
> > >
> > > [  5.732084] tpm_crb MSFT0101:00: can't request region for resource
> > >              [mem 0x79b4f000-0x79b4ffff]
> > > [  5.732089] tpm_crb: probe of MSFT0101:00 failed with error -16
> > >
> > > When I saw the iomem, I found two fTPM regions were in the ACPI NVS area.
> > > The regions are below.
> > >
> > > 79a39000-79b6afff : ACPI Non-volatile Storage
> > >   79b4b000-79b4bfff : MSFT0101:00
> > >   79b4f000-79b4ffff : MSFT0101:00
> > >
> > > After analyzing this issue, I found that crb_map_io() function called
> > > devm_ioremap_resource() and it failed. The ACPI NVS didn't allow the TPM
> > > CRB driver to assign a resource in it because a busy bit was set to
> > > the ACPI NVS area.
> > >
> > > To support AMD's fTPM, I added a function to check intersects between
> > > the TPM region and ACPI NVS before it mapped the region. If some
> > > intersects are detected, the function just calls devm_ioremap() for
> > > a workaround. If there is no intersect, it calls devm_ioremap_resource().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com>
> >
> > This problem is still valid and not addressed by Vanya's patch (and
> > should not be as it is a disjoint issue).  However, calling
> > devm_ioremap() is somewhat racy as the NVS driver is not aware of that.
> >
> > My take is that this should be fixed in the code that assigns regions to
> > the NVS driver e.g. it could look up the regions assigned to the
> > MSFT0101 and ignore those regions. In the end linux-acpi maintainers
> > have the say on this but this would be the angle that I'd take to
> > implement such patch probably.
>
> Matthew pointed out that having a hook in NVS driver is better solution
> because it is nil functionality if the TPM driver is loaded. We need
> functions to:
>
> 1. Request a region from the NVS driver (when tpm_crb loads)
> 2. Release a region back to the NVS Driver (when tpm_crb unloads).
>
> My proposal would unnecessarily duplicate code and also leave a
> side-effect when TPM is not used in the first place.
>
> I see this as the overally best solution. If you can come up with a
> patch for the NVS side and changes to CRB drivers to utilize the new
> hooks, then combined with Vanya's changes we have a sustainable solution
> for AMD fTPM.

It's a great solution. I will update this patch on your advice and
send it to you soon.

By the way, I have a question about your advice.
If we handle the NVS region with NVS driver, calling devm_ioremap()
function is fine like crb_ioremap_resource() function in this patch?

>
> /Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-10 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-09  9:09 [PATCH v2 0/2] Enhance support for the " Seunghun Han
2019-09-09  9:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] tpm: tpm_crb: enhance command and response buffer size calculation code Seunghun Han
2019-09-10 12:34   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-10 15:12     ` Seunghun Han
2019-09-09  9:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] tpm: tpm_crb: enhance resource mapping mechanism for supporting AMD's fTPM Seunghun Han
2019-09-10 14:42   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-10 15:06     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-10 15:28       ` Seunghun Han [this message]
2019-09-13 13:12         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-16  8:18           ` Seunghun Han
2019-09-16  8:42             ` Seunghun Han

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHjaAcRf3fcJMp6AwVRTrVaABZVzSkhBwRcpKZogAS4SSDK3zg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kkamagui@gmail.com \
    --cc=ivan.lazeev@gmail.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] tpm: tpm_crb: enhance resource mapping mechanism for supporting AMD'\''s fTPM' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).