From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACD0C433DB for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 18:35:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E2D64E49 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 18:35:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238476AbhBDSfS (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:35:18 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50344 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239184AbhBDSd7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:33:59 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B53DC06178A for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:33:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id h7so6043099lfc.6 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 10:33:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hsUHxWVQ9pn1uVdqIrgpTfjCGGtb4+YVBfEy6i5I4j8=; b=MIpB4GK7A+9drQZ10/Y0xovSPfiwOCvliMddfq/jpGDedVMqXyhEAhy7KYlKseXjin A2upjPV9hbYJ3KKwZxV7a8IotVYydpQXhvxCZReUKugIa6aGcF5zj1akjgRTnweyO43c TVmSCIRenACFaf9Nu8ulsM6OzU/sCMUNDL6H8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hsUHxWVQ9pn1uVdqIrgpTfjCGGtb4+YVBfEy6i5I4j8=; b=oQoLkvcCRqudhxNiLKvSe+6dZY4kWihTtDkb5WMO8lxHeSG+Rh1Ide8hTYfLRzCuI7 3pH7VwPviaNtBr4nUGItTasTF1Pj9z8jS822U/PHV/cE7IQd+VEdX7U2A9Nwhu2rv8wT AiKvYaiQSODVSnGLwssoMynAKwiBjvp/NUS49LBE6NsfG2KCKk+Z76EV4EFOVax+T1ZI I06XoZ0TDKCU+gH2HW4+ou4fmuG3pNFBSZemx5vQFWoNXLOQFPJIM5bUfvkIRNxxhg4Y BJPsLUmbgyk8NFG4BnJUMK/bu9m/yvWdvArNlSkgFL93GrcMYwqJiYSq7ZCeFiY+R/lT zPSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53292ZXHJARxEeKNZXWd3Tga4TpOOo4hGljh/4l3wTPYnVQXDXN0 Eo3LdmCZb+zVs5wlU0UMjeP0vh3K1E5AwA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxbb8sd7UFcpHahh8CfQhFHJ9aXBiTX1R8wGue127uNq3+hWo8NeetW3zcEXohMqUbyasqCeA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3253:: with SMTP id c19mr352576lfr.245.1612463594635; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 10:33:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lj1-f178.google.com (mail-lj1-f178.google.com. [209.85.208.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r21sm705674lfm.207.2021.02.04.10.33.13 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Feb 2021 10:33:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-f178.google.com with SMTP id v15so4559141ljk.13 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 10:33:13 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a2e:720d:: with SMTP id n13mr421266ljc.220.1612463592842; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 10:33:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <161160687463.28991.354987542182281928@build.alporthouse.com> <20210204181925.GL299309@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20210204181925.GL299309@linux.ibm.com> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:32:56 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Linux 5.11-rc5 To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Chris Wilson , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:19 AM Mike Rapoport wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:49:39PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > Mike: should we perhaps revert the first patch too (commit > > bde9cfa3afe4: "x86/setup: don't remove E820_TYPE_RAM for pfn 0")? > > Unfortunately, I was too optimistic and didn't take into account that this > commit changes the way /dev/mem sees the first page of memory. > > There were reports of slackware users about issues with lilo after upgrade > from 5.10.11 to 5.10.12 Ok, applied to mainline. Greg & stable people - this is now commit 5c279c4cf206 ("Revert "x86/setup: don't remove E820_TYPE_RAM for pfn 0"") in my tree. Although maybe you just want to revert the commit in stable, rather than take it from upstream? Same difference. Linus