From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD99DC432BE for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 15:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6AB260ED4 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 15:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237494AbhH3Pci (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 11:32:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35292 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237085AbhH3Pcg (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 11:32:36 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC299C061575 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:31:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id c8so19464405lfi.3 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:31:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=p0kOZNrasloq0VyNOKkM6VkVzIYu/+jMAU4U9uSDKVQ=; b=YERcgoTLA5AXdTVRuoawvzo7fkitkBZX7e6CVaUMsgF33ZBZjfsE+0Lu+IGYBKFQgR C7Fir0FnEyxCZxlq/Cr9tP4I+u3XWNG+Uy1rNysPbFI9NO12/PbkXyuWneAG9vLBXk1g aTEkQfk+NScRj3ASxntN07hkyehX6NUU9+N4c= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=p0kOZNrasloq0VyNOKkM6VkVzIYu/+jMAU4U9uSDKVQ=; b=npeBwQWuabPfaDRX8Hw7agTe6bIc9ln8GBOHjIE/eHtfZboA3knGNBISFJ8HvTl9Gi 05nwK8rc0nQMzwBbETn43sjXYWJWEDNm5RBOy174sQi2Lb+HSzEedNgHfQABf43v6lRs lroQnxSwbYnl/1lK8sAWPLJFv6gHloXksFUpe2ZjDbX7mqzw+0rx7knq7sVKBvi2Hurh 6XeW0Noa5ej2yZeqhsTdrlD6ININzVCLF3MJ0GW7HzhkgaeIxcaEpehDhG2gFUZI18eT v0tCqnIIaTLUuqn9QiHfKBOe5z/Rf70ciGEJItV00DqHa5V7y97VEIifR/9UY6DqgO6H ez3g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530PPTpyQ8WqvgGaFqnbZLRL3Szw4cn/LDpjXvVvYgen0xlSMdyk 2K40oMhTR2gwFNz+XWFe60YfaGjdAtGi1Tkg X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJycavh25DgsB/gacP+5KXEa+jwlXeGtcPSn/lKAGjAIHRyT3fos7imkzl+4bXPiXAdBKN+YGA== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:482d:: with SMTP id 13mr5672324lft.120.1630337500717; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:31:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-f172.google.com (mail-lj1-f172.google.com. [209.85.208.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d13sm1420014lfk.232.2021.08.30.08.31.39 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:31:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f172.google.com with SMTP id i28so26606027ljm.7 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:31:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7d0e:: with SMTP id y14mr20881081ljc.251.1630337499647; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:31:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <0f094eb9-11d4-1bd5-0a1b-823317ad4f7d@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:31:23 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] console: consume APC, DM, DCS To: nick black Cc: Jiri Slaby , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tetsuo Handa , Daniel Vetter , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 2:59 AM nick black wrote: > > Jiri Slaby left as an exercise for the reader: > > So simply: > > return state == ESosc || state == ESapc || state == ESpm || state == ESdcs; > > Sure, I can do this. Would you like me to recut the patch? > > > I wonder if we can simply hide them all behind single ESignore? > > I'd rather not--I have plans beyond this patch which will > require differentiating between them. I've applied the patch as-is since I'm starting my merge window work with "random patches in my queue". I'm not 100% sure we care all that much about trying to make the console be more vt100-compatible, considering how long we've been at the current state. But I have to admit to being slightly emotionally attached to us doing reasonably well on this side. One of the original things Linux did was console emulation, even before it was an OS.. Linus