From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD21C71153 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 19:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232373AbjIJTFS (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Sep 2023 15:05:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34780 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229447AbjIJTFP (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Sep 2023 15:05:15 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E4E913E for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 12:05:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2bd6611873aso59125941fa.1 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 12:05:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; t=1694372705; x=1694977505; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oqvxcwzpC3/aD7COrxRo/r5ZoCc7FtwXVuKZgiIZ2z8=; b=Mm7IMVWXgA67RNaYEq98jXkH566ybs/TTGCY1aOCunwPGZw3aNYc9/4D2ol0AVIreC +XxA7Ud7LWf1aohzmfYfnCO9IWwvPc03CFxu2RyArGNMqVllcFlNe9uIeiKwajIDn5tV dyis64XrIvZjb6xhQiS367dqoNEey5thUBLrE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694372705; x=1694977505; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=oqvxcwzpC3/aD7COrxRo/r5ZoCc7FtwXVuKZgiIZ2z8=; b=OdBFaII0q0d7Z2ud7X2GC4T7lq65gjaIIS7Ta666iZWgVkce9tnO8pEIet+4UVqYzc 4OZcWrpONOZMRZLmfbJsN88OpsAvCqJ5YsQkYVzeKQll+JrxCHVozeR/A83kfeSFs+U7 KVc0ugpbcAVPEbHprM61oPjc+vC6/DikMAy0IvZwRBod3inRXwgX+5zaikxbDdNWmDeX gmBBLDs69E+ASQztSAX3gwFuvVb2/14PKC2EDbbnDtgW8NNBRl7wJN0ckx96tiHx22Uf Cud+M7+jgvxkmQiKdBVkuJ5zNsdCgABKK1pqXHgK6vEK50sQat9GXVhei5usLQTzrXxR xwew== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywg16ZJDkwzpoVksbTiZiQ2Fz487TA6ohwQWHgMOAxwTi6An/Xb 6Th9kst3gHqxYgyScBCMPvR6ouR/BdSB7ixtiVEda7GA X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHGPvMGr29lJhYN2cacnx1izOYslLTLCpWNNRI4nHlAygbXb5sPQTh/wDE0UQD4KXEzOrHCVQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:80c6:0:b0:2ba:8127:a2c3 with SMTP id r6-20020a2e80c6000000b002ba8127a2c3mr6419049ljg.34.1694372704988; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 12:05:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ed1-f42.google.com (mail-ed1-f42.google.com. [209.85.208.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z20-20020a170906241400b009829d2e892csm4190111eja.15.2023.09.10.12.05.04 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 10 Sep 2023 12:05:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-52c4d3ff424so4902402a12.0 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 12:05:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3098:b0:9a1:d077:b74f with SMTP id 24-20020a170906309800b009a1d077b74fmr6557487ejv.49.1694372703888; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 12:05:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2023 12:04:46 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [git pull] drm CI integration To: Dave Airlie Cc: Daniel Vetter , dri-devel , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 18:00, Dave Airlie wrote: > > This is a PR to add drm-ci support files to the upstream tree. So I finally had no other pull requests pending, and spent some time looking at this, and I see nothing offensive. I did wonder how this then expands to having more than one subsystem using this (and mixing them possibly on the same CI system), but that's more about my ignorance about how the gitlab CI works than anything else, so that's certainly not a real concern. The other side of that "I do wonder" coin is for when others want to use the same tests but using some other CI infrastructure, whether it's some AWS or google cloud thing, or github or whatever. Anyway, considering that both of my idle curiosity reactions were about "if this is successful", I think me having those questions only means that I should pull this, rather than questioning the pull itself. If it works out so well that others want to actually do this and integrate our other selftests in similar manners, I think that would be lovely. And if - as you say - this is a failure and the whole thing gets deleted a year from now as "this didn't go anywhere", it doesn't look like it should cause a ton of problems either. Anyway, it's in my tree now, let's see where it goes. Linus