Re: [git pull] drm for 6.8

[Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>]

On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 11:49, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Let me know if there are any issues,

Your testing is seriously lacking.

This doesn't even build. The reason seems to be that commit
b49e894c3fd8 ("drm/i915: Replace custom intel runtime_pm tracker with
ref_tracker library") changed the 'intel_wakeref_t' type from a
'depot_stack_handle_t' to 'unsigned long', and as a result did this:

-       drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "async_put_wakeref %u\n",
+       drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "async_put_wakeref %lu\n",
                power_domains->async_put_wakeref);

meanwhile, the Xe driver has this:

  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_wakeref.h:
        typedef bool intel_wakeref_t;

which has never been valid, but now the build fails with

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c: In function
‘print_async_put_domains_state’:
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c:408:29: error:
format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but
argument 5 has type ‘int’ [-Werror=format=]

because the drm header files have this disgusting thing where a
*header* file includes a *C* file:

  In file included from ./include/drm/drm_mm.h:51,
                 from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_types.h:11,
                 from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h:11,
                 from
./drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/gem/i915_gem_object.h:11,
                 from ./drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h:15,
                 from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c:8:

nasty.

I made it build by fixing that broken Xe compat header file, but this
is definitely *NOT* how things should have worked. How did this ever
get to me without any kind of build testing?

And why the %^!@$% does a header file include a C file? That's wrong
regardless of this bug.

                   Linus