From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7C3C742D7 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 21:38:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05BC2053B for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 21:38:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1562967492; bh=LPcquNFArDwm4DxXmALh4qjSnT77WfW+v2QWO4Dp6mc=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=JuNqX9Sydl2pf+ZPlH3ur0aNrG9QECvxKsATqBy0NzyhwEytR++h2K7F31Jjr2nLk 8ZflsEVhekPVGESLzabp0BAgdEjGTAvDYRcZLaWDEQP4akqeMLLZMU8QF4AQgzv/4v e9F+4MQ2+3pP0H6f0/Hjbj9JjFH6EFoYOfBV/1H4= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728098AbfGLViK (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2019 17:38:10 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f180.google.com ([209.85.208.180]:34508 "EHLO mail-lj1-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728037AbfGLViK (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2019 17:38:10 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f180.google.com with SMTP id p17so10704214ljg.1 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:38:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Iges54z9f906v3uf56WrVXdsTxZk1k/p5wstrSlWhSY=; b=HStbbQgKwJ8PIs2uRSFT6FkcEsY2ELzgFwmB768U+IJZZIFRRG1kKdnBHfLT6+Z8OH pymcd7+1yH6IPng+WI5ltxwoX/fgziXsRTRa+yCzqVYrrGIZQh2D0MUXgqTwhIuI2r8/ OJRqvn3weItgeO9YFFvdX9jsIcpP4D+ZARYcM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Iges54z9f906v3uf56WrVXdsTxZk1k/p5wstrSlWhSY=; b=YEPC/8wTKxOcQBC30T9ITCnui4dQKiL0vJC3ICmfVxJkjqqPgFdHHGftTKuyicJI5R VWSbMCEyMPI4rT7tLhHUhIz6ApqiyUv0nIDjTDYYSMJT+qafhI0PwdIbvTcCeNCRuRyF sFJtzELpBPap7iY5dvq7BAlT2b81fEc8T9kUu7rZV4Oy7VAqbG8KTVfHicSBxJ0wZ3th e4sHNkne1erejwNhS7XAoz4c/8x3Mcdz+RFfpuvHtxqs19tPDcp2Xwc7AisKTZvpl1RL leAx4+UdhbHsvnnFkKoYGWzhh0qF678aRI7CfrwfcruETdjB3E1S7D2hjLoX/xldJTzE y65Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXizNh8F2lvGFjc7K7Fj0rvCum+JOV35c8ebNrCHC5FpF12YQ4E Tn3J/i2Ths3buI7hJnLECTyco8XDnrU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxkLX0E4RtRFdSxR07AIQg+aRj6zPswNuwoZTo9ph1/W71yIl8NwnvS5jS5vZGEJ2/mC4CcEQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8945:: with SMTP id b5mr7013202ljk.93.1562967487683; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:38:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com (mail-lf1-f48.google.com. [209.85.167.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i62sm1620985lji.14.2019.07.12.14.38.06 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:38:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 62so2496185lfa.8 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:38:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:ac2:44c5:: with SMTP id d5mr5948568lfm.134.1562967486231; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:38:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190712073623.GA16253@kroah.com> <20190712074023.GD16253@kroah.com> <20190712210922.GA102096@archlinux-threadripper> In-Reply-To: <20190712210922.GA102096@archlinux-threadripper> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:37:50 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Driver core patches for 5.3-rc1 To: Nathan Chancellor Cc: Greg KH , Andrew Morton , Linux List Kernel Mailing , Stephen Rothwell Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 2:09 PM Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > Doesn't look like this made it into the merge, as I currently see that > same error with arm64 allyesconfig. Duh. Because I had fixed up the actual definition of that function during the merge, I thought I had handled it all correctly. ... and entirely missed that the patch was for the declaration in the header file. My bad. Will apply the fix properly. Linus